Tulsi has a lot of shady shit, but it's awfully shallow minded to give her shit despite the fact that so many other candidates have abhorrent records.
Enough has been said about Biden with his problems touching young girls, his attempts to invoke his son's death to bash medicare for all, him helping Republicans get elected to congress, him defending segregationists. Say what you want about Tulsi, but the worst parts of her record did not occur during her campaign for office.
It's not just Biden either. You have Mayor Pete who expressed concerns with Chelsea Manning's sentence being cut. Meanwhile Tulsi has stated support pardoning Snowden and Manning.
Enough has already been said about Kamala Harris's record as attorney general. You also have Beto O'Rourke who called for police going door to door to confiscate guns, which Julian Castro pointed out would see a spike in police violence.
You have Marianne Williamson with her anti vax shit, you have John Delaney's borderline fascist "mandatory National service" plan (yes he is still running somehow).
So all that shit is okay, yet they draw the line at Tulsi because they still listen to corporate media that tells them what to think?
Holy shit neoliberalism is a fucking cancer.
@AnnieGal iunno, from what i've seen the latter two were very seriously criticized for the things you mentioned even among "liberals", and neither are really considered to be viable candidates.
@devurandom Neither of them recieved nearly as much shit as Tulsi has though. And I haven't heard anyone criticize John Delaney aside from leftists/Bernie supporters.
Server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!