Looking into Masto thinking about how to make it work...
Not sure what you mean with functions equally well compared to Twitter. I agree, Twitter failed as there is little discussion, more vain one way postings and a lot of negative vibes. Would you say it is a question of technology and UX/UI to make Masto work or one of social contracts and rules of usage?
I must say that 500 chars can lead to discussions based on arguments not on statements. That's a great chance here compared to Twitter.
As I understand the logic here it is neccessary to have some people follow you from other instances and then appear in the timelines of those instances with toots of high visibility. As most people follow back you'll soon could have an instance overlapping bubble and are visible on the federated timelines. From this point on communication offers can start.
My approach here was to first look up user names I knew from Twitter and follow those I found.
@xldrkp Yesh. But there's no clear way to follow a person from another instance (except by chance should they show up in the federated timeline (at least, I assume this is the case)). So they have no way to follow me, either.
It's as though Mastodon defined 'community' as those people using a specific Masto instance rather than as a collection of people.
No, true. And there's no reason we should upload our address book to the silo here. But we should be able to share lists (privately?) with each other.
Which we sort of can do - I click on your name, then click on 'followers', and see the list. But it's only a local list - we're still stuck in our local instance.
I did an experiment a few years ago on Twitter where I only followed 150 people (after reading about Dunbar's number). More recently I've used lists for that on Twitter.
There's definitely something to be said for being intentional about who we connect and converse with, both in person and online.
Dunbar's number is about right as an upper limit on the number of people you converse regularly with (versus 'follow').
I think it's a design feature. There are APIs - it may be that the developers looked to 3rd party applications to create multi-community communities. I don't know. But I'm sure it's not a technical limitation.
Except: the problem of multiple accounts on different instances.
But here you have people from three instances in a conversation, so there's that.
I have found people to follow by recommendation: someone I follow boosts something from elsewhere into my timeline. The rough formula for this: I started with a mix of about 20 active users, and their prompts created just enough steady growth in recommendations that I developed my home timeline to run at the right pace for me.
Hope this is helpful.
This method of slightly random introduction feels a bit more like sliding onto a bar stool next to someone you slightly know, and then after a while they introduce you to the person sitting the other side of them.
It's agreeable because it's not happening at speed dating speed. It's a quietly expanding circle.
And I think we come back to: all of this would be a lot easier if the interface weren't so awful.
I'm still only using the middle column. The left column shows my posts, but I don't really need that. I think the right column is trying to show a threaded discussion list right now, but it can't decide whether I'm in one conversation or three, and anyways it's in chrono order to it just keeps putting the old posts at the top.
What do you have in the right column? (The right column either shows what you searched on or selected -- a person or a hashtag or a threaded conversation -- or the local or federated timeline.)
I find it useful for looking back over long running conversations, or persistent hashtags.
Concerning the interface: I don't like it either. There is another instance called https://halcyon.social/ that appears a lot more like Twitter or Quitter.
Subway Tooter is an Android app https://github.com/tateisu/SubwayTooter that I got recommended by @socrates , the admin of my instance. It has the feature to have more than four slots that can be arranged in desired order - or deleted.
I agree, that's a problem. But for me the choice to register on "scholar.social" was that I heard it should be a place for scholars to meet. So, it was the dedication of the instance that attracted me.
Then, the question might be not which individual to follow but to visit another instance with a certain dedication or character that promises to be interesting. Like a club or bar you go to because you hope to meet interesting people.
You can tell who is not on the same instance as you buy hovering on their username at the top of a toot and looking at the title popup (the little white text box that appears a second later). If they're on a different instance, you'll see it as "email@example.com". If local, it will just be "username".
The fediverse is relative to a given instance. In other words, you don't see everyone in the total fediverse from your instance, only those people who other locals on your instance are following. So it's in your best interest to follow people in other instances, which in turn benefits your fellow locals.
Also, it would be impossible to follow the entire fediverse. That column would just be a blur, likely causing a lot of epileptic seizures.