⛈️⑨ is a user on mastodon.social. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse. If you don't, you can sign up here.
⛈️⑨ @Elucidating

So is it the plan that there will be very limited matodon servers that only federate with a subset of the whole?

Like, will electrical engineers have a mastodon instance? Or is that pointless?

· Web · 2 · 2

@Elucidating Try it and see? I'm definitely keeping an eye out for instances worth having a second account on, but hanging out on .social for now

@jordantcarlson I guess I dunno how federated instances can interact.

@Elucidating It can be useful, since it could make the local timeline be largely about the chosen subject... But I guess such specialization would require a client that can manage multiple accounts on multiple instances, or else it's just not worth the effort! :/

@Elucidating That seems like it would be an emergent property, and could be pretty rad if it develops and has community buy in

@lieselotte I am trying to work out how I feel about this idea. It has pros and cons.

The amount of labor even one social media account introduces makes me surprised people are all game for 2.

But I think it's very... what even is the word for the post-cyberpunk world we live in where a less fully connected social graph is a FEATURE we seek out?

@Elucidating It seems self-defeating, honestly - part of the draw of a platform like this is to make new info available for everyone. We just need better ways of organizing it, like lists

@loather As I've said in some other tootootooTOOOOOOOOTs it may actually be a feature that information has a slower propagation speed across these networks.

The notion of an instantly connected global social medium is one only Twitter and advertisers seem to propose.