Follow

The more I write in or even , the more I want to switch to some other format with more extensive features, or roll my own...

I want something with easy footnotes, definition titles, semantic sections, section CWs, etc, without having to resort to inserting HTML, and keeping it human-readable.

@FiXato LaTeX? Not familiar with it personally, but it must have at least footnotes and semantic sections since it's for academic text.

@lj_writes yeah, is something I am considering, but I have a feeling that that will end up not being as intuitive to write for me, and not as human-friendly to read as-is.

@FiXato Yeah the trade-off between features and ease of use is tricky :/

@lj_writes yeah, especially it's an older format that tries to please everyone. I guess why I'm currently mostly considering rolling my own.

Unfortunately that would mean losing out on support and the likes, so for now I'm trying to work around it with little backward-compatible hacks.

Relevant I guess: xkcd.com/927/ ('Standards')

@FiXato @lj_writes please don't roll your own format, there are already too many of them. you can use #latex with #GithubPages, see kodymirus.cz/overleaf-html-sam for example.

@michal_h21 using to deploy to (or I guess any other CI tool to convert and deploy to an alternative platform) is an interesting solution I hadn't actually considered yet, thanks. :)

does still look quite human-readable, apart from some of the complexer structures (the \verb part in the example for instance).
I'd have to experiment a bit with that to see if that would work out well enough for my usecase. :)

@lj_writes

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!