I think if the "fediverse" were to have a logo, it should make use of the space analogy. Make it a graph between stars, with some stars in the background. Not just a very generic graph.
@Gargron When I think "Federation" I think Star Trek, so yeah, a logo with stars seems very appropriate.
Maybe not a straight up ripoff of the UFP emblem, but one that evokes the same ideas.
@Gargron I never really realized that Fediverse was it's own huge thing, I thought it was just a part of Mastodon
@Gargron This logo does make it look like a place for gay witches, and I can't argue with that.
@Gargron We should just adopt the UFP logo tbh
a constellation shaped like a mastodon came to mind, but the execution of such a thing would be tricky. fine line between "a blob that's oh yeah a logo" and "a logo that's a little generically shaped" and all
@Gargron a universe of worlds, definetely
@gargron I'm not really sure what "fediverse" means. Wouldn't e-mail be part of that? So basically everybody is in *that one* already. 🤨
@clacke but is it federated if the protocols are only open but not interoperable? I mean Diaspora or pump.io would be an example, right? They don't support ActivityPub. By pinning it down to open standards I see big wormholes in that "fediverse".
@clacke that sounds like we are on the same page, regarding AP being the big bang of the fediverse.
@mray IIRC Fediverse refers to all servers that speak the OStatus protocol. So Mastodon, other ActivityPub applications?(I think Activitypub specifies a way to fallback to Ostatus), GNU Social, Peertube, etc all fall into this
@Gargron How about a fractal that combines star-like and graph-like visuals?
Why not just make it the activity pub logo? That's the primary federation protocol after all.
Something like this?
Follow friends and discover new ones. Publish anything you want: links, pictures, text, video. This server is run by the main developers of the Mastodon project. Everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!