@Gargron Good text, and a good idea to add this explanation. It's a cool feature so it's worth adding this text to explain why, what and how. 👌
@Gargron "want to manually review these accounts" perhaps.
@Gargron What is the exact scenario when this happens? I'd suggest putting more factual information in the message, and less vague text ("server staff thought" or "you might want to"). So if it's when moderators have chosen to 'block' the server, the message could be:
The moderators of [server name] have decided to block [other server name]. Therefore, you have to manually review follow requests from their users.
This also increases user autonomy since they get some insight in how it works.
I'd also go with more generic message, skipping the “even though your account is not locked”, because user knows it already and it would look weird if there are more than one request.
But I can't think of any other variant to suggest ATM. Thought of “marked suspicious by staff”, but this is not the actual case.
“The [domain/user] requires manual follow review per admins' decision.”… nah
A lot better than the previous one.
Server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!