@Gargron Anyway, sorry for troublesome. We understand your culture and the current issue affects to many people.
We are going to comment on the Github issue. Please just a moments.
We understand you deeply consider Japanese culture. We really appreciate your kind support and consideration.
@Nicra I wouldn't characterise this as a freedom of speech issue. The content in question is illegal in some jurisdictions.
Not only that, but because Mastodon instances can be moderated then the Admin of the instance can be held liable for the content.
This isn't a case of "I'm not federating with you because I don't like what you say", this is a case of "If I federate with you and this sort of content is being shared I can get in serious shit"
@troubleMoney It belongs to specialists (lawyers/judges) to discuss & decide those issues in every jurisdiction. Web developpers arent liable for the behavior of those who use their tools, no more than BMW will be held accountable if I use their car as a weapon. #Mastodon isnt a malware. The admin of an instance may get into trouble with the law, but this is none of @Gargron’s concern. No one is supposed to be conversant with the law of 150+ countries. #FreeSpeech #JustMyOpinion
@troubleMoney No, I didn't know. But I hope other admins will act differently. This is like playing "god" in my opinion (and introducing too much politics in his administration). He is being too serious about his "social responsability". Everyone should be allowed to decide for himself what kind of content he wants to be "exposed" to. Hopefully, Mastodon allows users to bypass admins who feel overresponsible for their users. :) @gargron #FreeSpeech
@Gargron @pixiv since I'm not sure if you can actually read the replies from over on pawoo here is what I wrote "I think feeding specific tags into the content warning system which then can be blocked by other instances could easily "fix" this problem without actively denying people to create things legal in japan you just need to get people to properly tag this lol"
Jumping in... Didn't see the images in question, but if they are what I'm thinking they are based on the conversation, I'd ask they be called what they are (child sex abuse images).
And if that's what they were they should not only be moderated but reported - by anyone who saw them. If not because of mandatory reporting laws then because it's the moral, ethical and human thing to do.
Silence causes real harm to real people.