If I could submit a "feature" request, there would be just one: will you, please, reconsider the license? :) Currently only Hubzilla uses "MIT", ten other projects are under AGPL3.0, one - GNU3.0 (gangGo), one - Apache2.0 (pump.io). "MIT" license is fine.. but... a bit too permissive, may be?
Anyone is welcome to request features ;)
That was built-into my project philosophy from Day-0. Posting to GitHub direct would be -ideal- that way it is easier to track XD
I'm not sure why we picked MIT, and I've not really thought about it too much since. Another thing to add to the discussion board.