A lot of folks' fear is that when Mastodon grows it'll absorb bad people. I'm gonna say this. I think even if Mastodon literally grows to the size of current Twitter, the world will be better off overall just because of how Mastodon is structured and what values it represents and what tools it provides for dealing with those problems.
> I think even if Mastodon literally grows to the size of current Twitter
I can agree with the caveat that it'd be distributed, checked growth
unchecked growth -- well, think of any invasive species
adaptation at certain rates is fantastic
adaptation beyond certain rates, from what I've seen, favors some pretty horrible outcomes :/
Imagine Mastodon being ccc.de. They have tools, right?
@Gargron No one seems to really recognise that part of the great thing about Mastodon is that you can pick an instance as per your tastes, moderated as such. The issue with Twitter having bad people is negated on Mastodon by blocking accounts and servers; you aren't trusting only one central moderation team.
How do I fix this on top of my profile???
But it's in any case also much about culture not just software.
the fediverse is a cyber space. The information that are shared have impact on ppl and ppl's behavior.
If we can continue to grow mastodon with mostly progressive ppl it will have in future a stronger cultural influence
Once it catches on to mainstream and many centrists, liberals, etc. get introduced to...well fediverse culture.
And yes there are millions of progressives who haven't joined yet
@Gargron I think as a community we should acknowledge their fear and make sure they feel heard. That is fundamentally what twitter has failed to do.
From a technical perspective we're not worried about shitlords ruining it but that doesn't mean that people who were traumatized on twitter share our confidence that the new system will protect them.
We need to be able to sort of culturate the influx, I think.
We can see historical breakdowns in usenet's eternal september.
I can't help but wonder what the critical mass is one way or the other
I think because mastodon is /so/ distributed though, it has a much higher critical threshold before disintegration kicks in.
If they don't charge for it? I don't know.
I personally wouldn't mind paying a few dollars a month to use a good Mastodon instance, but it would be a really hard sell for people who expect social media to be free (in other words, almost everyone)
Users might also be willing to pay more for media uploads/downloads, opening up market for media-less instances (that likely cost less).