Follow

"Wait," said the alien, "I have heard this story before."
The human paused. "Oh, maybe I have told it-"
"How can this be? A story is given, from teller to listener."
"Yes?"
"How can you still have this story?"
"Oh! Humans do not lose a story once it is told. We share."

@deshipu
FWIW, I share my stories freely, while simultaneously claiming copyright and ownership of what I create.

@MicroSFF @deshipu Attribution is simply good manners. While by "copyright" people often mean the right to prohibit the dissemination (conditionally).

@amiloradovsky
There are a few different issues bundled up into the copyright concept:
1. Attribution and assertion of authorship
2. Control of distribution (e.g. if I got sufficiently upset with Twitter, I might want to boycott it, and would not want people to crosspost the from here)
3. Control of monetisation (e.g. someone like ThreadReaderApp tries to earn money from what I have created without my consent, or without offering me payment)

@deshipu

@MicroSFF @amiloradovsky TBH the whole idea of giving the first person who came up with certain information control over it — as if it was a physical object — is slightly problematic. Is every musician making a pause infringing on Cage's 44'33"? Is an independent discovery of a patented thing an infringement? What if you were inspired by some existing work without realizing you were?
I find the preoccupation of our culture with "firsts" a bit weird.

@MicroSFF
This reminds me of the more fungal~bacterial aliens in the scifi I've read. Maybe like a distributed web, they keep some metadata to reference it, but prefer to reassemble it from floating blocks of other neural debris across their ecosystem.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!