The truly wild thing is that we can understand the need for these basic revisions in our understanding of the world with just a bit of early college level mathematics.

Surprisingly, the answer appears to be no. We can certainly imagine theories underneath QM which have more in common with Classical Mechanics. But all such theories appear to require a huge metaphysical revision - we must give up locality or admit retro-causality or accept the existence of many worlds or accept that our own world is a sort of illusion caused by the dynamics of the "real" world, which is a big wave function.

So the question naturally arises: is Quantum Mechanics like a coin flip. In other words, can we imagine that some complicated hidden theory is operating underneath the Quantum Mechanical, probabilistic description, which recovers all the elements of our classical world.

But if we have a super computer and a very careful account of the initial conditions of the coin flip and a good model of the coin's material distribution, and the hardness of the surface it strikes and so on, we can imagine getting arbitrarily close to predicting the outcome with 100% confidence.

Its easy to imagine something like this. The actual dynamics of flipping a coin are extremely complicated, but if we confine ourselves to the question of what side a flipped coin will land on, then we can ignore all the petty physical details and recover a surprising powerful theory: the chance of getting heads (or tails) on a fair coin is 50% regardless of all the details of each individual throw.

In other words, we imagine that quantum mechanics is just a statistical theory which describes some unknown but classical system.

The most natural impulse here, if we want to hang onto the notion that such classical ideas like position and momentum and energy really do exist, is to imagine that Quantum Mechanics is not a complete theory.

Last time we noticed that unlike classical mechanics, where a direct analogy between elements of the theory and elements of reality exists, in QM we only predict the probability distribution of elements of classical reality in QM.

Ex-neurophysicist, present data scientist. On a post-phd quest to complete my theoretical physics education. Lisper of the Scheme variety.

Joined Apr 2017