Web developers: when you say, “this browser does not support our site,” what you REALLY mean is that you don’t support the browser. Don’t turn it around on the browser/user because you chose not to stick to universally-supported standards, or worse, are doing user agent sniffing.

@cassidyjames This is the same issue with distros though, you can't expect the devs to support every possible configuration out there.

@alatiera @cassidyjames with web you have polyfills that should cover most cases unless you use some fancy API that Google just added to Chrome

@bilelmoussaoui @cassidyjames You can make the same case with glib and gtk and "stable apis" but we know it doesn't hold cause the tiniest change in the system can break things.

Web engines are no different, they don't all of them behave the same way and we know their behavior can drastically very or be bugged and bitrotten.

@alatiera @bilelmoussaoui @cassidyjames absolutely everything you need to make a perfectly fine website has been completely stable and identical in every major browser since 2015. the only stuff that’t fragule and breaks are towering frameworks, package managers and translation layers built for people who think actually learning javascript is for barbarians.

Follow

@zensaiyuki @bilelmoussaoui Have fun trying to implement any kind of webrtc system and have it behave identical in all 3 major engines...

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!