Remember remember,
the 8th of November,
your accounts and your wallets so swiftly dismembered.
From arguments about borders
To ATMs out of order
Was it worth the negligible
black money surrendered?
#demonetisation
@shubhamboseroy oh hey
PSA: You can discuss a judgement, even disagree with and criticise its reasoning and outcome. That's not "disrespect". Disregard all the centrists who are saying otherwise.
In Suresh K Koushal v Naz Foundation (2013), the SC upheld the constitutionality of Sec 377. Imagine if we didn't discuss that at all.
10. BIG BREAKING on #AYODHYAVERDICT :
Nirmohi Akhara's suit declared as barred by limitation.
Also, they are not the shebaits for worship of Lord Ram and the Ram Mandir, test of exclusive rights of management not fulfilled. @TheQuint@twitter.com
Please follow @VakashaS for responsible live-reporting of the Ayodhya verdict. Seriously. Turn off the TV. And follow him.
4. If you'd prefer to listen to a podcast on the history of the case and what the 3 main parties
- Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara & Ram Lalla -
have argued to stake their claim, check out our 2-part #AYODHYAVERDICT special @TheQuint@twitter.com here:
https://www.thequint.com/podcast/explainer-revisiting-ram-janmabhoomi-babri-masjid-title-dispute-case-before-sc-verdict
2. We have a live blog already running with all the updates from inside and outside the court @TheQuint@twitter.com
#AYODHYAVERDICT
https://www.thequint.com/news/india/ayodhya-supreme-court-verdict-for-ram-mandir-babri-masjid
RT @parasnsingh95@twitter.com
Dear friends in media, please be extremely careful in live-tweeting the pronouncement of the verdict in the #Ayodhya case. Do not just pick up one utterance of one judge to break the news. There are five judges on the bench, there may be more than one judgment. Be patient.
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/parasnsingh95/status/1192850281802821632
journalist