Björn Schießle 🇪🇺 is a user on mastodon.social. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse. If you don't, you can sign up here.
According to rms, SPDX has agreed to change their license identifiers to clarify GPLvN only vs. GPLvN+:

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/identify-licenses-clearly.html

That's great news!
Björn Schießle 🇪🇺 @bjoern@mastodon.social
Follow

@mikegerwitz I'm surprised, according to the spdx documentation they already support the '+' operator to identify 'or any later version' licenses. spdx.org/licenses/

@bjoern The issue was that using something like "GPL-3.0" isn't clear to the user---especially users inexperienced with licensing---that it won't be compatible with future versions of the GPL. When a user chooses a license for her project, there's nothing suspicious about "GPL-3.0".

If it's "GPL-3.0-only", though", users will wonder what the alternative to "only" might be.

@mikegerwitz Thanks for explaining. I see the point. Although I never understood the SPDX identifier as a list which helps you to chose a license for your project but rather as a machine readable identifier you add after you have chosen a license. A list which help you to chose the license should be much more descriptive than just a name, also gplv3-only would be to short in my opinion. Therefore I'm not sure if this change solves a real problem. But anyway, I got the motivation for the change.