@aral Hmm, potentially a forgone conclusion, though I expect it to go like this:
1. Someone writes a very nice mastodon-like app but they license it liberally (not AGPL)
2. Someone makes a custom instance with some "cool features" which are not being upstreamed or shared
3. Lots of cool instances with cool extra features
4. Some of these instances become more commercial-centric
5. When the VCs come, already too many political connections between instance admins to make blocking possible.
@aral The "ideal solution" would probably be a software license like AGPL but which also disallows any inter-connection with instances containing proprietary code. This locks it open, but at the cost of being non-free-software (freedom zero) & annoying lots of FSF lawyers.
In the mean time, we can at least distrust any "cool new fediverse app with MIT license"
@aral Another solution is a mastodon inter-connection rules:
Rule 1: Block any instance which uses proprietary code
Rule 2: Also block any instance which doesn't also follow Rule 1 or Rule 2.
@aral Sorry s/mastodon/fediverse/ I know the distinction, I'm just lazy and tend toward accessible writing over correct.
Invite-only Mastodon server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!