@hugh I guess if you treated "per" like "of" in the 2nd instance (which is similar to how Italian sometimes substitutes "di" (of) where you might have mean per/for), then by that somewhat tenuous stretch, it might, just maybe, make sense.... after a pint or two.

· · Web · 2 · 0 · 0
@dadegroot @hugh to me, it sounds like they took a sample of 100.000 and calculated the % from that

@dadegroot @hugh It's written pretty poorly, but it's clear, I think.
Out of a pool of 100000 events, this particular event happened 1.2 times on 100 occurrence.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!