My socialhub thread about Pixelfed Groups got hijacked lol, interesting to see some of the responses.

Will be back to working on Groups this weekend, and will post an update to that thread!

· · Web · 2 · 2 · 4

Sorry, I participated in the hijacking, but in my very feeble partial defense, that thread was posted in the fediverse as a standardization effort...only later did I see your OP. I am ashamed of myself...

@bhaugen No worries, I'm glad people are discussing this feature and hope we can all work towards a common implementation!

@dansup @bhaugen

I am sure guilty too..

We might rename the topic and move to category?

@humanetech @bhaugen Thats fine with me! I can create a new topic later if I need to.

@dansup Well, that thread is really vital. Concerning your implementation: Have you documented it somewhere?

BTW: Have you considered transmitting the "generator" field as well? See:…

In Friendica we use this field. It could possibly help with different group implementations to detect how this has to be handled by the other side.

@heluecht @dansup If you need to implement special behaviour based on software name it's a sign something has gone wrong with the protocol

@Gargron @dansup Well, by now it is not needed. But it seems as if there could be different group implementations out there in the future.
Sign in to participate in the conversation

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!