hunger, poverty, money, military 

The estimated cost to end world hunger is approximately $30 billion per year. Ending world poverty would cost $175 billion.

In 2018, the world had a collective military budget of $1739 billion.

Hunger and poverty could be eradicated with just 12% of the amount of money spent on "defence".

The USA alone could reduce its military budget enough to end hunger and poverty, and still have the largest military spending in the world.

military carbon dioxide 

Additionally, the US military is the world's largest consumer of oil.

In 2011, the US military used 117 million barrels of oil. Assuming average combustion engine efficiencies, that equates to around 13 million metric tons of CO2. There is no reason to believe they used less in 2018.

Emissions from the military are conspicuously absent from most publicly available information on CO2 emissions by source.

Show thread

the military is a global burden 

It's not so easy to find estimates for global military oil usage or CO2 emissions. Chances are, it's proportional to their available budget though.

It's safe to say that warfare is one of the biggest drains on our planet's resources and one of the largest contributors to the climate crisis.

In short, if humans could get over their obsession with weapons and violence, a lot of the world's problems could be alleviated or solved much more rapidly.

I'm just saying.

Show thread

the military is a global burden 

@InvaderXan Medicine is the one area where I can see the angle that without warfare it would have been more difficult to develop treatments for some types of injuries because those don't normally happen much outside of war and medical ethics prohibits experimenting.

But we're still in that position with many, many, many types of injuries anyway. And if they're so common that the treatment saved lives, then we'd work it out eventually.

the military is a global burden 

IMO, there are probably no innovations the military have made which we wouldn鈥檛 have made by properly funding scientific (including medical) research instead.

re: the military is a global burden 

@InvaderXan @dartigen

I would have passed up atomic, biological and chemical weapons...

re: the military is a global burden 

@ckeen @dartigen
Without the military, I doubt anyone would fund weapons.

re: the military is a global burden 

@InvaderXan @dartigen

That's what I think too

re: the military is a global burden 

@ckeen @InvaderXan Could've poured all of that wasted money into, IDK...cold fusion or whatever...

And it would have left nuclear power way less politically fraught, which would make it way more appealing to a lot of countries. (As it stands, no matter how transparent and honest a state is and how many times they demonstrate that they are not developing nuclear weapons, if they have nuclear power they're instantly suspect.)

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Server run by the main developers of the project 馃悩 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!