@charlag Why, though?
@dpwiz they exercise their power do shape the internet the way they want.
Forcing website owners to have Google Analytics to rank well in search? Done.
Forcing publishers to use AMP to appear in search? Done.
Using their huge advertising machine to promote The browser which ignores standards ad it pleases? Done.
Huge surveillance machine? Done.
Developing military drones? Done.
@charlag Do you imply that switching to alternative search pages is a most effective policy to prevent them from developing military drones?
But that's different. We need to tell people to not use google: to protect themselves from surveillance and to not feed the beast.
Power of Google comes from scale. We need to continue developing and offering privacy conscious alternatives otherwise people will shrug and "well there's no other email, is there?". And they might just not know about it.
I'm certain that my privacy interests are aligned with Google needs for exclusivity on the raw data. The incentives are laid out in such way that it doesn't make sense for them to "sell their users".
I believe by strangling Google we'd do ourselves a disservice and simply inviting Chinese giants to steward the world in the direction of their chosing. And you'll get even less privacy and more imposed "standards", simply by having a different culture.
Unlike other big tech Google is, allegedly, is an AI-first company. The others are, mostly, "money-first" (or "privacy-first", for that matter). Chinese look "money-first" too, but The Party is very technocratic and very interested in governance efficiency AI-based solutions bring. And they go "look, have all the money you want, but we require you to R&D the hell out of AI and close the technology gap whatever it takes".
Server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!