Free, subsidized world-wide shipping for products from China is a price we just can't afford to pay.
On the contrary, we're overpaying for this by further destroying our environment and economies.
Mind you: I'm not trying to bash Chinese products here. But please, let's not pretend shipping something worth $5 across the entire globe is something you'll get for free.
@fribbledom That is all true, but at the same time, that $5 product is shipped together with hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of other similar products on a single massive cargo ship for most of the journey. The shipping cost will indeed tend to approach zero.
@fribbledom either way the products will come from China as probably most of the stuff we consume is produced there nowadays. Regardless if we buy from Aliexpress or Amazon or any other local reseller. To fight this we would need to buy locally produced electronics. I'm wondering what kind of consumer electronics is still manufactured in Europe at all 🤔
@aslmx @fribbledom And also we would have to consider the whole production chain of a product, not just the 'last assembly'. I would like to see a whole graph with locations for all steps in the chain for a product. E.g. a Jeans -> the fabric is produced in V, then shipped to W where it is treated with colors/chemicals, then shipped to X where the fabric is cut into pieces, then shipped to Y where it is sewed and MAYBE finally Z where it is packaged. There are presumably even more steps involved
@fribbledom also it is funny how oversized packaging for some orders is. Sometimes 80% of the package is air or filling material...
@fribbledom I think it's less the problem with low-cost/free shippign and more the fact that we don't have any clean energy sources for boats and planes
I have to disagree. Lowering the overall carbon footprint is a chain of many events. Since planes are the most polluting mode of transport and ships are the least, the first link should be less planes and more ships. Of course that brings second problem - ships are still not fossil free, so the second link should be less fossil fuel ships and more electric ships. Which brings the problem with toxic chemicals in batteries, so the next link is ...
@fribbledom ... less li-ion batteries and more carbon-carbon batteries. This is already pretty far away in the future so it's harder to predict what the next link might be after that. Maybe less carbon from ground and plants, and more carbon from the atmosphere.
But if you just delete ships in the first link, you will actually have more planes and worsen the overall situation.
@fribbledom I've always wondered how it makes sense that you can buy a single USB cable from China for 99p including shipping. And that's before you consider the externalities.
Invite-only Mastodon server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!