Mozilla is shutting down their IRC servers and moving to Discord, a proprietary chat service.
Hey Mozilla, aren't we forgetting something here? Our very own "Mozilla Pledge for a Healthy Internet” states:
> Principle 2 The internet is a global public resource that must remain open and accessible.
> Principle 6 The effectiveness of the internet as a public resource depends upon interoperability (protocols, data formats, content), innovation and decentralized participation worldwide.
@SwooshyCueb much better that then the myriad UX issues that come with trying to find an IRC client or (in the best case) using one of three shitty iframe'd irc web clients
@SwooshyCueb not to mention the inherent problems with the protocol itself—discord provides just a straight-up better way to structure communities at scale then IRC. Channel fragmentation is real
@nightpool I'm not saying IRC is better, just that Discord doesn't seem like a great choice if the move is accessibility-motivated.
Maybe Mattermost is a better choice?
Also free and open source software is about basic rights and not "purity" as you put it.
Also proprietary software is an accessibility barrier for privacy and security conscious users.
when discord locks you out of your account and forces you to give up your phone number that's an accessibility barrier
when discord recaptchas you every login that's an accessibility barrier
when discord bans your account no questions asked because they catch you using a third party client that's a god damn accessibility barrier
Accessibility is much better in IRC and other text based protocols than webapps.
You do not need to be a blind user to appreciate a protocol that can be used with accessible programs instead of a browser. It starts when IRC clients are much easier to theme with high-contrast colors and easy to read fonts.
The lack of image embedding prevents things like somebody posting a lord of the rings meme without alt-text to communicate something, so blind readers are left behind.
And what seems to be neglected in the discussion is that IRC is a protocol that does not demand authentication. Just join and ask your question. No registration, no waiting on double opt-in e-mails, no need to solve reCaptchas. Just enter the chatroom and start chatting.
And even when you think this is not too much efford, you're still demanding people to use a strong identity, when a anonymous one, i.e., an unregistered pseudonym, would be sufficient.
I'm not trying to bash Mozilla here, really not. Big fan of Mozilla and what they did for keeping the net as open as possible...
We still need to be able to criticize them when they take a wrong turn, though. I hope public discussion can make them at least reconsider said decision.
seriously? I'm on discord, full disclosure, but even a mook like me realizes that their sharp, ad-free interface is most likely funded by the most egregious sales of user data.
mozilla is losing a significant amount of cred with this one. It's not as if there aren't plenty of great alternatives.
@fribbledom as far as I understand their reasoning, there's just no viable open alternative. Although I don't know why running a Jabber server is not an option. It should at least solve the problem with the lack of authentication in IRC.
@fribbledom Has mozilla confirmed anywhere that Discord is their final choice? Their blog post said they were going to be evaluating options, and hadn't chosen anything yet.
The Rust projects were already using Discord, and they mentioned that they were leaning in that direction for their remaining IRC channels. However, the Rust community doesn't represent Mozilla as a whole.
I guess an official statement is still pending on that subject, but it's what I hear from people on the "inside".
So there's at least a clear tendency, and I think this needs to be brought up right now, not when the final decision has been announced publicly.
@fribbledom absolutely, I agree. Discord is a miserable choice for FOSS communities, so I hope it's not true. I hear the complaints that IRC is tough to moderate, but I do think there's some stuff out there (e.g. Matrix) now that can carry the open-ness torch with easier moderation/administration.
@fribbledom Someone's gonna open a triple-service bridge. If it's possible with Discord, that is.
TBH, I don't know what's going on in the Mozilla IRC tho.
chrome-based mozilla browser when
you know, since we're not letting purity get in the way
@fribbledom I wish instead of selling out to closed systems, Mozilla would double down on a "simpler than IRC" chat system that's still open by default. Discoverability of Discord and Slack instances is terrible.
@fribbledom Discord is so hard to use and inaccessible in China. IRC is great but I don't see any one using it in China except for the staffs in Red Hat.
@fribbledom this let me appreciate more all the free alternatives coming from firefox, like palemoon and seamonkey
@fribbledom I'm incredibly disappointed by this. This really shouldn't be a problem when there are options like Matrix. There's no need to close down their servers, either. They can have both, if they really deem having Discord necessary.
Really, this just feels like a slap in the face. They're supposed to be representing open standards.
moving the discussion rooms of my open source professional project to the closed source chat for gamers
@bob @fribbledom I’d rather use IRC or XMPP than Discord for the simple reason that it doesn’t take me between 5 minutes and half an hour to log in, to the point of developing a PTSD about this crap (and about my webmail, too).
On the other hand, Mastodon uses Discord too. I’m not sure the decision, from Mozilla, to move to Discord is an half-baked decision. Again, if free software developers used Mozilla’s Persona on their self-hosted solutions, it might have been different (with a ubiquitous login solution for all FLOSS projects).
Except that unlike Mozilla, most free software developers started to care about UX about 5 years ago. Discord’s front page says, verbatim: “Say goodbye to Skype and Mumble.”
@fribbledom IMHO discord as good as facebook, it is easy to join and find, but in the end it just ends up being where everyone is because no one can get motivated to leave.
You can't even block/mute someone someone properly for crying out loud without being the admin or leaving the "server",
that's not a good start to build a community like most games these days don't even have a good way to run a propelry administrated server without breaking some ToS or etc.
@fribbledom Any project or community based around any level of respect for the users and themselves moving to Discord just cempletely voids all respect for either. Imagine moving Kernel development onto Facebook. It's completely backwards!
@fribbledom #FuckOffDiscord !!!It's the worst messenger ever!I can understand that IRC is pretty outdated and something more modern is needed,but there are really better options.Matrix for example is a bit similar to Discord but open source and federated.Other alternatives which aren't federated but open source and selfhosted are Mattermost or RocketChat.There are very many solutions and they've chosen the worst of all.Good job Mozilla!
@fribbledom mozilla is fucking up all the time these days. I have little faith in them to be a meaningful force for good anymore.
Server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!