FSFE: "Statement on Richard Stallman rejoining the FSF board"
>The FSFE realises that we ourselves and the Free Software movement still have to work hard to be that place where everyone feels safe and respected to participate in it in order to fulfill the movement's mission.
Yeah they bloody do...
@fribbledom I am sorry but until the FSFE shows it's willing to talk to RMS about his controversial views WITHOUT cancelling him, and not reading between inexistent lines, I can't support FSFE.
the damage caused by this fuss is much more harmful to the community as a whole than whatever it is that RMS said that was taken waaaaay out of context and misinterpreted on purpose to take him out of FSF.
it's also interesting that everyone speaking against him are employed by big tech companies, huh
Let's follow the first link on this matter from the appendix of rms-open-latter: https://web.archive.org/web/20210325014348/https://stallman.org/archives/2016-jul-oct.html#31_October_2016_(Down's_syndrome)
RMS said "I think the right course of action for the woman is to terminate the pregnancy" and literally "I don't advocate making rules about the matter".
@carcinopithecus @xinayder @fribbledom And let's follow the link about child pornography, again from https://rms-open-letter.github.io/appendix: https://web.archive.org/web/20210325014131/https://stallman.org/archives/2014-jul-oct.html#26_October_2014_(Prison_for_cartoon)
RMS says that production and distribution of CP should be illegal, but possession of images, especially if they are cartoons, should not.
I'll add that making possession of images a crime leads to unexpected consequences: incentive for cops to upload CP to suspect's laptops, and a threat for any internet service providers who make backups.
@carcinopithecus @xinayder @fribbledom Also footnote  links to https://web.archive.org/web/20210325014959/https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html and doesn't have the text they quote. It is the same link as . Turns out nobody proofreads this appendix. They also say  is transphobic, but don't tell why. The only thing I found is that RMS suggests using "per" instead of "they" when one needs a gender-neutral pronoun, to avoid confusion with plural pronoun: https://web.archive.org/web/20210323151211/https://stallman.org/articles/genderless-pronouns.html
@carcinopithecus @xinayder @fribbledom Using "person" instead of "they" in http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html is far from being "transphobic" though, as https://rms-open-letter.github.io/appendix tries to put it. Calling it a "campaign against using people’s correct pronouns" would be appropriate if RMS insisted on using "he" for someone who chooses "they" as their pronoun, but this is not the case here.
I'd also welcome a much more balanced view on this topic like this one: https://www.wetheweb.org/post/cancel-we-the-web
It is alright to question his capabilities on building welcoming communities (as the comment by doctormo does). But as the GNU kind communication guidelines show, he's at least trying to improve on this issue. (https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html)
However, a sentence like "Free Software is meant to serve everyone regardless of their age, ability or disability, gender identity, sex, ethnicity, nationality, religion or sexual orientation." in the FSFE's or other statements on the topic, while certainly true, make it look like RMS wouldn't agree on that.
So the bottom line is: yes, RMS can come across very creepy and that might make people uncomfortable and possibly stop them from participation. That's not good. But this lynch mob attitude against a single individual and anybody associated with him can't be right either.
Server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!