Follow

"For a real-world example, they pointed to Gilead Sciences, which markets treatments for hepatitis C that have cure rates exceeding 90 percent. In 2015, the company’s hepatitis C treatment sales peaked at $12.5 billion. But as more people were cured and there were fewer infected individuals to spread the disease, sales began to languish. Goldman Sachs analysts estimate that the treatments will bring in less than $4 billion this year. [1]

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20

“[Gilead]’s rapid rise and fall of its hepatitis C franchise highlights one of the dynamics of an effective drug that permanently cures a disease, resulting in a gradual exhaustion of the prevalent pool of patients,” the analysts wrote. The report noted that diseases such as common cancers—where the “incident pool remains stable”—are less risky for business." [2]

@hisham_hm One more reason why we need open access to biotechnology.

Corporations have no interest in curing people, but people do.

@hisham_hm This is why Americans spend the most on health care, and are over-medicated, and American families go bankrupt (46% of bankruptcies?), and Americans live shorter lives than their counterparts in other wealthy countries. There's no money to be made off healthy people.

And this the model that is spreading to the rest of the world too.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

Follow friends and discover new ones. Publish anything you want: links, pictures, text, video. This server is run by the main developers of the Mastodon project. Everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!