@pixelpaperyarn That's surprising. All the other indie authors I follow have reported the opposite, with their print sales being dwarfed by digital sales.
What about your production process requires extra effort for digital releases?
@pixelpaperyarn Yeah, it's not a universal rule.
I am surprised by the workflow. That sounds like the reverse order of what I usually see, including my own. But it works for you!
@jaycie it's graceful degradation in a publishing paradigm. 😆
it partly comes from my previous life as a print designer. i make it look really good in print first, and then slowly strip my pretty styling back down until i'm at raw text again.
in the process, i clean the text up so at the end, it's super clean.
@pixelpaperyarn Playing to your strengths! Conversely, I'm someone who drafts everything in Markdown and writes Ruby scripts to auto-generate PDFs. %D
@jaycie i think people just like reading our stuff in print for some reason. we do have the stories up on the website as well (which is changing next year, so we'll see).
i start with print files, reformat for pdf, export that to epub (which has to get manually cleaned up because InDesign does weird formatting), and finally to kindle (which is a simple conversion).
i get clean html from the epub and that goes to the website, so i wouldn't be saving tons by dropping digital.