Heh I forgot stuff.
@clacke The wording is explicitly *not* allowing a relicensing to AGPL 3.
It allows you to add the restriction to the combination as such, but you'll still receive the covered work subject to the GPL-3, not the AGPL-3.
Which gives you the freedom to take it back out of a combined work and reintegrate it into another GPLed work.
@robby That's technically not correct. It says:
The terms of this License will continue to apply to the part which is the covered work, but the special requirements of the GNU Affero General Public License, section 13, concerning interaction through a network will apply to the combination as such.
today i offer you two cats in pants
@bremner Excerpts of artists I've seen live and enjoyed
I've also seen Kansas, but that was not exactly optimal.
To be fair, when I saw them, they were all old whitehaired dudes.
Debian Developer, Ubuntu Core Developer, Software Engineer II at Canonical. Green. Not a bot.
Love cooking, cycling, walking, music, and netflix.
Server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!