@ij Anwesenheit besser gesagt Abwesenheit des Dialogs reicht da schon aus.
@jwildeboer π gerichte
@clacke The text in section 13 is in both licenses, in the opposite directions, essentially. @jwildeboer @wizzwizz4 @robby
@jwildeboer Or in other words: It's also a common verb, you might miss important stuff!
@jwildeboer You can't trump that feeling?
@clacke The wording is explicitly *not* allowing a relicensing to AGPL 3.
It allows you to add the restriction to the combination as such, but you'll still receive the covered work subject to the GPL-3, not the AGPL-3.
Which gives you the freedom to take it back out of a combined work and reintegrate it into another GPLed work.
@directhex Ryzen π
@robby It has notable impact in that you can then simply take the source code and make all your changes AGPL-only, which is something the language in the GPL is supposed to limit.
@robby That's technically not correct. It says:
The terms of this License will continue to apply to the part which is the covered work, but the special requirements of the GNU Affero General Public License, section 13, concerning interaction through a network will apply to the combination as such.
@zhenech I feel like end date would be highly unusual in this linguistic context.
I approve.
RT @Erickajamon@twitter.com
today i offer you two cats in pants
π¦π: https://twitter.com/Erickajamon/status/1330195224497360899
@bremner Excerpts of artists I've seen live and enjoyed
Asia
Bryan Adams
Bon Jovi
Eagles
Journey
Ian Anderson
John Fogerty
REO Speedwagon
Toto
I've also seen Kansas, but that was not exactly optimal.
To be fair, when I saw them, they were all old whitehaired dudes.
Debian Developer, Ubuntu Core Developer, Software Engineer II at Canonical. Green. Not a bot.
Love cooking, cycling, walking, music, and netflix.