a non-violent, non-destructive crime you can do
✅ find a really old TV with a UHF dial
✅ attach antenna
✅ browse around UHF channels 80-84
✅ stop when you hear one-to-three-second snippets of people talking
✅ tell a buddy what you heard
Congratulations! You just intercepted and disclosed an electronic communication, 18 U.S. Code § 2511, a felony w/5 years max imprisonment.
@thraeryn this reminds me of something i've noticed about language, particularly in the US but more broadly too:
"criminal" is treated as a habit instead of as an action.
what i mean by this is, there's certain descriptors that apply only when someone's doing something. you're a pedestrian only until you stop walking. you're only a customer when you're in the store.
other descriptors apply to habitual actions, like jobs: teacher, driver, etc; or lifestyle choices: hiker, smoker, and so on
@thraeryn these aren't hard categories; "hikers" could refer to people who habitually hike or people who are currently hiking right now.
but "criminal" and related terms (like felon) tend to be used in the habitual sense. people in jail are "criminals" even though they're not committing any crimes, because the word is considered to mean "the type of people who commit crimes" instead of "people who are currently committing crimes"
@thraeryn and i think that reflects a cultural idea that there is a kind of person who commits crimes (and that those people are bad)
that sort of idea that leads to policies like stripping felons of rights. i think if people only used "criminal" for people -in the act-, it would change perceptions significantly
just consider the difference from "the criminals in jail" to "the prisoners in jail"
("unconvicted felon" is a similarly good way to get people to re-evaluate their thought patterns)
Server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!