... in order to "prove" that he has been "abusive" and "controversial" from the very start; that he "defended paedophilia" and exhibited "creepy behaviour towards women".
@lohang You lost me right from your first toot when you mentioned, and I quote, the "metoo lobby". That's a very bad way to start a conversation and a wrong characterization of a spontaneous movement that wants to shine light on the scale of sexual abuses in our society. You frame all this with a conspiracy theory lens which immediately invalidates any argument you're trying to make.
I suggest you delete those toots and start over.
@lohang #RMS himself agreed it was necessary to resign. The media coverage framed him as defendant of the atrocity, and by correlation, others were insinuating that the movement itself was like #Stallman. According to him in the libreplanet-discuss mailing list, @fsf approached him suggesting him to resign, and he agreed. Also, he told that in order to support the movement, people need to continue support and renew their #FSF membership.
@lohang neither MIT nor the FSF are democratic institutes and idk why you seem to be under the illusion that they are or even should be. RMS' words and behavior where unacceptable in that instance, and many others like it. I owe all of my software philosophy to him and I am still glad he is gone. Being a prolific hacker and savant institutionalized polemic writer does not insulate you from the consequences of your words.
if you want to discuss why RMS single email (and past behavior) was fair grounds to remove him from a leadership position, my mentions are open. but if instead this is just an avenue for you to complain about witch hunts and media misrepresentation im strictly uninterested.
im reaching out because i respect you and am genuinely curious about why you think MIT or the FSF should step up for RMS.
Server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!