@switchingsocial @mastohost Although I value how you try to spread the use of mastodon, masto.host doesn't seem in any way a decentralized system.
It goes against the decentralization principle of mastodon.
Not saying masto.host is bad, just saying it doesn't help diversity a lot, rather it centralizes a bunch of mastodon instances into one host.

Follow

@yimo it’s a valid point. Although in my opinion if you can move in and out of Masto.host then you are not centralized.

The ownership of the data is always of the instance admin and only the admin controls the instance rules and all other instance related decision. The admin has full power and not me (Masto.host)

There’s a centralization of hosting infrastructure but that is also true for MailGun (that is used by the majority of self-hosted instances)

@switchingsocial

@mastohost @yimo @switchingsocial Still decentralized in terms of not owned and operated by a single for-profit company. Regarding hosting and related services, many, many folks are gonna, at one point, be using DigitalOcean, or OVH, and Amazon, and Cloudflare and the likes, and they're probably better off that way—and safer!

@janboddez @mastohost @switchingsocial My view changed when I realized you can get your server's data in and out of masto.host. Indeed that helps decentralization.

As for server hosting companies like DigitalOcean and the like, I don't oppose them, but I still believe you're better off having the server self-hosted. Probably not a budget choice for a lot, including me. But if you can I think it's a big relief.

This discussion is interesting

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!