Is any anti-national still tooting here?

K boosted

Everytime a country that is accused of violating human rights is asked questions their first sentence is how some other community also sometime in the past was treated unfairly. This is not a defense but actually a confirmation that the country is violating human rights *NOW*.

I don't know why Govt of India keeps sending people to talk about Kashmir pandits because that is totally irrelevant to what is happening now and is actually a confirmation of allegations against India.

Everytime a country that is accused of violating human rights is asked questions their first sentence is how some other community also sometime in the past was treated unfairly. This is not a defense but actually a confirmation that the country is violating human rights *NOW*.

I don't know why Govt of India keeps sending people to talk about Kashmir pandits because that is totally irrelevant to what is happening now and is actually a confirmation of allegations against India.

This website is getting dull. Do that seven day thing @prasanna_s :)

Anyone from Mumbai interesting in catching up for a drink on weekend.

Friday has ended when even your jupyter notebook stops working :(

Good Morning mast-doston. Whats up? Gogoi J's last day and a Friday. What more do you want? Partyyyyy!!

I am disappointed that Supreme Court did not award five acres of land to Modi ji under Article 142 for executing the bestest contract ever.

This can be very confusing because this is not part of review jurisdiction. But CJI says, this is not just a review petition, there are other fresh writ petition a tagged along. So I assume if no other bench refers the case to 7 judge bench the Sabarimala verdict stands.

We need to very carefully read Sabarimala judgment. I can't see an explicit reference to any 7 judge bench. All that the judgment says is, similar issues are being dealt by other benches and they *may* refer them to 7 judge bench. *If* that happens please consider these issues too.

Gogoi J has spoiled my predicting ratio of Supreme Court judgments. My predictions are so bad now I might as well call myself an economist

I don't think I would want to continue commenting on Supreme Court judgments. There is no point. Have fun.

Supreme Court has officially held that--- show us the mob, we will give you the judgment.

Show more
Mastodon

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!