@mwlucas apologies for birdsite link, I know you wrote a book about tarsnap in the past. Did you investigate how this specific situation would count against quotas? I'm finding it hard to estimate what / if any cost will be generated by pruning old archives.

twitter.com/dr_jekyll832/statu

@mulander It's all accounting. Tarsnap will bill you for metadata back & forth. In this case, it will be "block 1 now only used in backups A, C, and E." Doesn't matter which order you delete in.

It won't re-download blocks you delete; it only updates the ledger.

IIRC --dry-run should give decent guesses on delete. It *should* 90% work from local tarsnap cache, unless you have corruption. (It'll use some bandwidth to verify local cache.)

Does that help?

· · Web · 0 · 1 · 2

@mwlucas yes it helps a lot. I wasn't sure if deletion won't result in re-packing existing archives. If I understand correctly it doesn't store on that level (archives+index) but on block level (+mapping). Makes complete sense now. Thank you!

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!