Interesting thread, though I'm not sure it was Reality TV that did all the breaking. I think the 1980s-90s removal of all social safety catches on capitalism pushed us to 'everyone competes'
<<Been pushing around some concepts about current culture today in my head, centered around reality television breaking our society. Notions of nuance, de-escalation, humility, and common service have been completely turned around by reality “TV” in favor of engineered conflict. >>
And I'm still not over my angry that it was the so-called *left*, as much as the right, that completely bought into the 'competition and individualism are good for the soul, y'all, cooperation just makes you weak and soft' mantra.
I know anger isn't helpful and so I want to be over it. But I'm not, yet.
I am still completely gobsmacked each time I think about Ayn Rand and realise, again, that there was a dedicated, organised movement in American culture since the 1950s to literally *call empathy and altruism evil*. To make people less loving. And that very high ranking politicians, businesspeople.... and religious leaders, who know and teach better... bought into it.
That stuns me. Still does. Every time.
How. How did that happen? How did we let these people, this ideology, run our society?
@notclacke That seems a little like 'politicians are coopting people's desire for clean water and air, so let's aggressively promote pollution'.
Because accommodating slavery and its cousins while espousing the assorted virtues made double think requisite for the elites throughout all of US history, therefore rendering them especially sympathetic to that program?
@chi505 I am sure that slavery has cast a VERY long shadow over all US and even all European (and African and South American and Eastern European) politics.
It's just been so deeply entwined into everything that it's very hard to remove. Have to take it strand by strand, as it surfaces into conscious thought, almost.
I have told various non-US folks that the answer to the question "why is the US weird in X way compared to other OECD states?" the answer is "slavery" for all values of X
@natecull what’s even crazier is that when you point out that a society where people give a fuck about each other is provingly superior in the outcome for everybody (less crime, higher life expectancy, fewer work hours, etc.) otherwise completely rational people turn their brains off and start citing bullshit litanies
@natecull Market fundamentalism is a hell of a drug.
@natecull The worst part of Ayn Rand supporters is that they call themselves objectivists. Self-applying that label is the apex of vanity.
@natecull Mind too: Ayn Rand was actively promoted propaganda. FEE, CATO, and all that.
While I used to be very baffled by leftist types who associated libertarianism with fascism, the older I get (and so the more relevant history becomes to me), the more I realise that the Rand / Reagan / Thatcher / libertarian / Austrian Economics nexus share a lot of the 'aesthetics' of classical 30s fascism.
Specifically, the feeling that 'life is unending brutal struggle' and that we need to stay 'hard' and 'manly' or Civilisation Collapses. A fear of social 'softness'.
I agree. And it didn't happen by chance. A Republican government, complaint Democrats, a major war... and 'somehow, magically' a flood of games and TV and movies pushing pro-war, xenophobic, anti-immigrant/refugee sentiment. It just happened! Yeah, media 'magically' aligning with government whims isn't actually magic.
I think it's why I started losing interest in videogames around 2003? Cos that was the last batch before the big Bush propaganda swing pushed Grunty Guys.
@natecull @FerdiZ So, totally weird self-discovery. When I was first tracking down orrigins of economic theology / free-market bullshit, and misrepresentations of Adam Smith, I ran across a title, "The Invisible Hand'' (1965), from a publisher I'd never heard of, Regnery.
Turns out the current generation has been a huge ssupporter of the neofascist movement and Milo Y., etc.
Mark Ames has some excellent exposes on libertarianism, rascism, fascism, nazism, etc.
It was all 'we gotta do everything to Beat Communism tm, even if that means making our kids hate the idea of fairness and sharing and teamwork, and our churches preach the opposite of what Jesus taught'.
@natecull The wole Red Scare bit, dating back to 1917, is simply bizarro world. I'm still digging into it. Tremendous repercussions, most especially on economic and social theory.
Ideaas (and people) in the least associated with Communist or Socialist sympathies entirely shut out.
That's only started to fade in the past decade or three.
@natecull It's not "altruism" that's evil, but forcing it at gunpoint. All of American politics since the 1930s has been reaction against first the slave-state of the Nazis, which we came too close to following, and then the Soviets, who literally ran the left, and now their heirs do again. Rand escaped from those fuckers and immunized us against some of their surface ideology, which helped keep us from making gulags and the commissars appropriating all wealth like the Soviets.
@natecull I always point people at 2 books: The Gulag Archipelago, and The Great Terror: A Reassessment. That could've happened here, too.
As far as I'm concerned, both parties are evil and would create tyranny. Happily they waste all energy fighting each other for control first, and it's essential to let neither win.
@mdhughes I share your fear about the experience of Communism. It was not a step forward.
But Soviet Communism and gangster capitalism are not the two only options for organising a society.
I also don't consider mainstream political parties to be evil.
I do, however, think that something particularly unusually bad is occurring in today's right-wing parties, while today's 'left' parties are mostly holding to what used to be the old center.
@natecull there are certain people who literally cannot understand why anyone would feel empathy or show kindness towards their fellow man. To them, anyone that claims to be able to, must be lying for the optics, because that's what the only situation they can imagine themselves being nice to others. It's amazing how they pretty much out themselves by accusing people of virtue signaling or being fake. It's pure projection.
@Yokai And what worries me is that this particular message and philosophy resonated so strongly with the people who went to elite business schools in the 1950s to 1980s, and beyond.
(Aside) Social Democracy =/= Democratic Socialism
Large parts of Europe have made a relative success of Social Democracy as a fundamentally capitalist system but with state organised social programmes. Meanwhile, some of the old Socialist countries are attempting to bolt democracy onto State run, planned economies. These two things are very different. But US commentators tend to be bad at confusing them, often for ideological reasons.
And then there's China.
@bob She certainly was just a cult leader, but a remarkably influential one (because of that existing anti-communist scene); not all cults include in their inner circle a future Chairman of the Federal Reserve.
It's that mix of very odd, extreme views ("altruism is literally evil") combined with followers who were eager to hear and in a position to teach and implement these ideas at the highest levels of government that make her more than just a crank with a couple of awful sci-fi books.
@bob But you're right; it's not Ayn herself but the elite interest in her ideas that's the weird part.
@natecull Read George Lakoff
Server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!