<< The average person tends to have either less than eight tabs open, or to add tabs without organization until declaring “tab bankruptcy” and starting fresh. >>

yeah, I'm the... second one

(checks browser; it reports 'new mathematical research needed in order to determine if your number of open tabs is even theoretically countably infinite')

freecodecamp.org/news/lossless

@natecull i obstinately refuse to ever close tabs even while my computer struggles and furiously diskswaps.
freeing up space memory and cpu time sounds like the garbage collector’s job. why is my computer making me do its job?

@zensaiyuki exactly how I feel, yeah.

I end up restarting Firefox instead of closing tabs

because I *might* need one one day

@zensaiyuki Actually, it's far worse than that.

The act of clicking on a tab to close it means i'm likely to read the page again, and then I'm likely to click more links. Into new tabs, of course.

@natecull i sorta want a browser with a different UI paradigm where pages exist in a kind of zoomable space, history stacks are visualised as skeuomorphic stacks of paper, and “new tab” just makes a new stack. a heuristic dumps old stacks to disk so they don’t consume memory or cpu, but if you go back they can rehydrate, and ideally not in a way that is effectively reloading the page, though that might be unavoidable.

@dredmorbius @natecull that surely is interesting but i don’t see the connection

@zensaiyuki @dredmorbius

It's kind of relevant, at least to my interests.

My 'webscape' is my set of open tabs, but only because that's all today's browsers give me. What I *really* want is yeah, massive and pervasive caching. Everything I've ever browsed, I want it downloaded and not to hit the Internet again unless it absolutely needs to. And then I want to search that stuff locally.

Today's browsers assume 'stuff lives primarily in the cloud/web,' but I want the reverse of that.

@natecull @dredmorbius ah yes that’s exactly what i want. that’s what i’m trying to build now actually. you’ll have to be patient though i have been trying to build it for 10 years, I’m just so bad at it.

@zensaiyuki @dredmorbius

Hmm. I wonder if just automatic saving of all web pages to a file/folder, plus a file containing a history of URLs.... wouldn't go a very long way towards this.

perhaps even just a local web proxy service, implemented in Node.js

The point is its database should be engineered for maximum accessibility of data by other applications. So a filesystem, for preference, not a database.

@zensaiyuki @dredmorbius

( I suppose a database for *indexes*, for speed, but the database must always be able to be regenerated from the filesystem )

@zensaiyuki @dredmorbius

Okay so.... does this already exist? Must be a million Node.js personal web proxies by now..... ?

@natecull @dredmorbius i’ve come to the conclusion that the only way to implement what I want, needs access to all the tab’s running state and its history stack. the only ways to get that are in an extension or a fully custom browser, like an electron app.

@natecull @dredmorbius and yes there are a gajillion proxy things. and I have been evaluating them for something I can build off.

@natecull @dredmorbius a lot of the reason it’s taking me so long is i keep thinking of things i want it to do, to the point it becomes unclear what the thing actually is.

@natecull @dredmorbius and then when i decide i need to write a programming language to write it in first it’s all over. i call it “the aristocrats”. actually the design document has the title “the big scope creep”

@natecull @dredmorbius is it a floor wax? is it a healthy toast spread? is it a face moisturiser? i dunno. it came to me in a dream 15 years ago and morpheus picked the wrong guy.

@zensaiyuki @dredmorbius

ooh, literal dream projects! I like those.

I had something similar happen to me around 2006. Still don't quite grasp what my dream-self was trying to express.

(although a large part of it seems to have been 'functional reactive' before that became popular with React.js and Elm... sadly, I didn't have any way of expressing what I want, and I still don't quite grasp what the core elements of FRP are)

@zensaiyuki @dredmorbius

My gut feeling though was and still is that we ought to be able to make both GUI and network programming much, much simpler than they are by expressing them as declaratively as possible and letting a simple runtime engine stitch together dataflow paths.

How exactly that runtime engine works, though, my dream-self left as an exercise for the reader and so I still don't have a handle on it.

Something like 'pure-functional reactive RDF' was my feeling, but... how?

@zensaiyuki @dredmorbius

I like what Elm is *trying* to do, but, I don't think it's got there.

Elm is all based on the ML family of programming languages and those just rub me up the wrong way, because their fundamental structures don't seem recursively decomposable at runtime. Too much done by the compiler.

We need a core algorithm way simpler; about two orders of magnitude simpler.

Elm's 'records' need to be expressible at runtime; and all of the source code must be expressible in them.

Follow

@zensaiyuki @dredmorbius

(This is why I went hunting for a syntax that would let me express 'record/object' like constructs as lists, in a logically/algebraically complete manner, and got kinda lost in the implications since they don't seem to QUITE map to existing structures. A key/value store or function doesn't seem to QUITE have enough degrees of freedom to express all permutations of 'a set of Lisp Cons cells', and that worries me. And I can find no literature on anyone else doing that.)

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!