This thing doesn't generate power. It only generates clout for its designer.

Show thread

4. "Sometime in the near future then, anywhere with enough span for a 25-foot wall could become a potential source of energy. “In urban areas, there’s not a lot of open sunlight for solar to work, says Doucet. “Wind is always there.”" – except when... it's not windy? What is this guy on?

3. "The only challenge would be to get the weight ratio right, so to make it lighter, Doucet envisions a framework made of aluminum, which can then be clad with any lightweight material." uhhhh that's the "ONLY" Challenge? Not the economics of building/buying all the parts and actually building the thing while still making it a reasonable purchase for anyone?

Show thread

2. Those calculations are EXTREMELY generous. Are you going to get an average 5m/s wind at ground level? no. In most US cities it's less than 4m/s at 10m high. Are you going to be as efficient as regular wind turbines, which have spent decades optimizing for efficiency? Also no.

Show thread

1. If you gathered all the kinetic energy from an 8x25ft cross-section of air passing at about 5m/s, you'd only be able to generate about 17kWh of power, not the 27kWh you'd need to power the average US home. (Assuming your generators are about 30% efficient, which most wind turbines are.)

Show thread

LoveFrom is the Bitcoin of the design world.

I'm taking 300-level uni thermodynamics and I've got to say: this shit rules. I feel like I'm finally at the good classes.

Mastodon

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!