Math articles on #wikipedia are just the absolute worst.
I reliably don't understand *anything at all* of what wikipedia math articles are saying, even for concepts that I already understand, have applied and implemented myself.
Like, I don't know if reading about a topic can actually make you understand *less* about it, but if so wikipedia math articles are the absolute holy grail of that field.
@phryk I completely agree, most of the time it jumps straight away into the minutia and makes the whole thing overwhelming.
@minitrope Yeah, most often I don't even get to understand what $thing does from a logical/semantic perspective.
This is making it really hard to do anything enjoyable with math, which is a real shame given how powerful it is.
Server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!