why is the "Proprietary" license-badge in the #ubuntu softwarecenter green?
@ted @milan Sure, I understand why it's done. Now we start a conversation about defining "better". A bug ridden free software app is always "better" than a functional and beautiful proprietary one? We show the license type / text so users are empowered to make the choice. We don't judge. Putting a red mark implies "bad", and we didn't like that. (for the record, I filed the bug to get it changed from red to green)
@popey @milan certainty when you consider the entire product there is more to consider than just the license. But here we are just talking about the visualization of the license field. Which is a simpler discussion.
I would agree that making proprietary red isn't fair either, but the western values associated with green are 'good' and 'go', which is saying it something you should do or find positive.
@ted @milan I agree that they shouldn't be coloured at all, or should be neutral. We recently did a lot of design work on GNOME Software - much of which is submitted for review and discussion on the GS gitlab. We presented different ways to show these fields. We will never please the fanatical FSF subscriber, but we can allow users to make informed decisions.
@popey @ted @milan Its not about "judging" or empowering users at all. Its not colored upstream cause GNOME is principled, and its *following* its principles on the Software it creates. Software Freedom is a principle of GNOME. See Allan's post:
Canonical is a multi-million, for-profit conglomerate that wants to make money.
Clearly different goals there. The problem there is that in this context its not distinguished that this is *Ubuntu* software, not *GNOME* software.
Follow friends and discover new ones. Publish anything you want: links, pictures, text, video. This server is run by the main developers of the Mastodon project. Everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!