Okay, hypothetically, if somebody was looking for a name for a Free Software project that focuses on Web censorship circumvention, using multiple configurable non-standard in-browser delivery mechanisms, what would a good name be?

Asking for a friend.

Basically the whole day of hacking on the little decentralization project today. Good progress. This thing is becoming surprisingly usable.

I will announce the new name (it's going to either be SideWays or Samizdat, most probably) early next week, and full code will follow shortly.

Haven't had a project I was that excited about for a long while. I missed that feeling a lot!

Show thread

Well that went fast! Rename complete, code a bit cleaned, stuff tested.

I give you Saмiзdaт:
git.occrp.org/libre/samizdat

Example deployment:
cdn.test.occrp.org/projects/sa

Go on, test in modern Firefox, Chromium, or Chrome.

There are g-glitches every now and then, but basically once the ServiceWorker kicks in you should see a "YES" there on the example page. When you do, you should also notice the favicon appearing. That means IPFS is working; there is no favicon on that server!

Show thread

is moving forward nicely. We now have some basic explanation on the landing page, a nicer display of methods used to fetch content, and (just implemented, hot from the CI/CD pipeline!) info on which resources were fetched using which method.

Check it out:
cdn.test.occrp.org/projects/sa

Pretty sweet, if I may be so bold to say so!

This is still Proof-of-Concept quality, and so many things can be done so much better. But it works already, in a way.

So, yay!

Show thread

For those new to the thing:
1. if you want to test it, load it, and then reload it -- or even close the tab and open a new one to load it again; this way the ServiceWorker will kick in and stuff will start happening;
2. it will not work without JS (sorry...), and it will not work in incognito/private mode.

To those who had already looked at it: I would be super interested if your service worker kicked in! You might not get the full functionality until the service worker reloads.

Show thread

TFW you need to refactor your code to use a completely new (to you) technique of dealing with some particular problem, using technology you don't really feel that comfortable with...

...and 2h later stuff actually works:
git.occrp.org/libre/samizdat/b

I am very okay with this.

Also, can now chain multiple delivery plugins. Which means I should now be able to implement caching using Caching API.

Show thread
Follow

Do I have a ticket where I am tracking this, you ask?

Why yes, yes I do:
git.occrp.org/libre/samizdat/i

Moar news: cache plugin implemented, but content not automagically pushed to local cache yet. You can test by:
1. going to cdn.test.occrp.org/projects/sa , reloading so that ServiceWorker kicks in
2. in JS console, run: await SamizdatPlugins[0].push(listLocalResources())
3. once the flurry of activity ends, block cdn.test.occrp.org in /etc/hosts
4. reload. should load immediately, and most resources should be marked as fetched from cache.

Show thread

Clearing cache is as easy as:
await caches.delete('v1')

Once you do that, while cdn.test.occrp.org is still blocked, you can reload the page and you should see load content (slowly...) from gun+ipfs.

So! Now we have two plugins. 😈

Show thread

New in : implemented auto-caching of successful requests, and UIs for clearing the cache and publishing to Gun+IPFS. Check it out: cdn.test.occrp.org/projects/sa

I will need to make caching a bit less aggressive, and/or Gun a bit more patient in waiting for the *latest* version of a given resource IPFS address, but all in all, works pretty ok.

Show thread

Also, some more UI niceness would be good -- displaying progress of pushing to Gun+IPFS, and informing user that cache has been successfully cleared, that sort of thing.

Show thread

Had a great long conversation with @tomasino about . Got some solid architectural advice. 👌🏾

Made fetch() into a plugin; we can now serve stuff from cache before a regular HTTP(S) fetch() goes out.

Next steps include:
- code cleanups
- reimplementing how we store/access data about which URL was retrieved how
- implementing a retrieve-from-cache-but-keep-fetching-in-background strategy so that a blocked site "loads" immediately, but the user still gets the fresh version eventually.

Show thread

Also added some project status info and how to contact us on the landing page and in the README:
cdn.test.occrp.org/projects/sa

My ToDo list still includes moving the project to a public Gitlab instance (0xacab.org probably, since it hosts a bunch of related projects including @sutty).

I really need to do this soon, but it requires setting up the CI/CD pipeline in a new location (probably on my own server). And that's a bit of work.

Show thread

Oooof, some serious code cleanups and rewrites in this weekend: git.occrp.org/libre/samizdat/c

The tl;dr is:
- regular fetch() is now also a plugin, which opens a number of possibilities;
- any plugin that can locally cache requests and responses is now treated specially: the first such plugin is called after a successful content retrieval automagically;
- if content is retrieved from cache, Samizdat continues trying to get it from a "live" source (fetch(), Gun+IPFS) in the background.

Show thread

This last bit was suggested by @tomasino and turned out to be simpler to implement than expected. So, yay!

To make a v1.0.0 that feels fully functional, we need to also:
- rewrite the SamizdatInfo (keeping the information on which resource was fetched and how) thing;
- add some fancy-shmancy UI displayed on any Samizdat-managed page;
- which will together allow us to inform the user "hey, we got this from cache, but there seems to be fresher version; reload please".

Show thread

Okay people, riddle me this: in I have a and one or more browser window contexts (aka "clients) that might be using said ServiceWorker. I would like to pass some information between the two. Most importantly I would like to inform the relevant browser window that all the fetches that the ServiceWorker was handling on its behalf are done.

Here's the ticket for more context
git.occrp.org/libre/samizdat/i

Show thread

Currently I am doing this by keeping the relevant information in Indexed DB. This has drawbacks:
- data is the same for all browser windows, leading to potential confusion if there is more than one tab open using the ServiceWorker
- there are no events to hook to catch when Indexed DB data changes, so it's down to setInterval() method, which is fugly.

Show thread

I *could* use Client API, specifically `postMessage` with `FetchEvent.clientId`, but clientId is not implemented on Safari (both Desktop and Mobile):
developer.mozilla.org/en-US/do

Show thread

I *could* use MessageChannel API, but it requires setting up a channel between browser window and the SW, and there's no way to track which channel is used for which browser window.

Plus, SW is quickly reaped, context destroyed, channel killed. On a new fetch() ServiceWorker restarts but the channel does not work, so a new channel would need to be set-up.

But that can only happen from the browser window side, whereas only the ServiceWorker knows a fetch() has started.

🐔 🥚

Show thread

I *still* could decide to use MessageChannel API, but would need to:
- keep track in SW which fetch is from which referrer (not sure that's possible even; probably available in Request.Headers)
- keep track which channel is for which URL/referrer
- it would still get confusing if there are two tabs open with the same URP
- and I would still need to do polling in setInterval() on browser window side, kinda defeating the purpose of the channel.

Show thread

So unless there is a way to hook an event in a browser window whenever a fetch() starts or when all fetch() events finish, MessageChannel API doesn't seem to be better than just using Indexed DB and polling it in setInterval() on a regularly.

And so it doesn't seem it makes sense to use MessageChannel API at all, since either it's not effective, or clientId gets implemented in Safari soon and we should move to that.

Show thread

But if I'm to re-implement the Samizdatinfo on clientId now, I need a sane graceful degradation strategy for Safari.

But perhaps I am overthinking this? Perhaps the only event I need is onload. At that point I'll know already if the page is loaded from cache or not, and can display a relevant message to the user ("cache in use, try reloading"), perhaps after a sane timeout (letting the secondary fetch() in SW try to finish).

Show thread

So perhaps that's my graceful degradation strategy for Safari (and whatever else doesn't support FetchEvent.clientId)? It will not be able to handle other resources (like iframes or whatnot) very effectively, but it'll be better than nothing. And probably better than what we have now anyway.

Show thread

@rysiek what's the best way for a random internet person like myself to contribute? I don't think I can just make an account on OCCRP's gitlab. Is there another way to trigger merge requests?

@tomasino oh, yeah, I need to move the project to a public Gitlab instance. Any suggestions?

And thanks for the nudge, I need it to get off my arse and move it! ;)

@rysiek hrm, not sure. i've got accounts at gittlab.com, bitbucket and github, so i'll find you wherever. I've just been doing a light organization on the index.html first, getting your scripts all together and deferred in the right order.

FF is being a jerk about serviceworkers on localhost, so i probably need to switch to my other machine and use chrome to do further testing. Or maybe just pagekite it... hmmm

@tomasino oh man, much obliged! One thing that was on my todo list was to separate stuff properly, have a general samizdat library with all the things that are useful to all plugins etc as a separate file.

I am not very good with JS, so it's kind of unclear to me how to do it *properly*.

@rysiek it looks like you're trying to avoid build tasks, so that does limit your options a tiny bit. What browser targets are you looking at? Modern evergreen only? You're using fetch, and arrow functions so it looks like no IE. If you go a bit MORE modern, you get native browser "import" support for modules.

I'll do stuff with a light touch first and give you a PR so I know I'm on the right track with what you're doing.

@tomasino this is a PoC, so yeah modern evergreen currently. Screw IE.

Much obliged!

@tomasino build tasks are fine, we just wanted to keep it as simple as possible to deploy. We do have a beefy Gitlab CI/CD set-up, but I'd like this to be easily deployable by a random admin with a WordPress site. ;)

@rysiek admirable goal. No worries. I like keeping things native when possible as well.

@tomasino [re: confusing functionality of gun-ipfs.js]

There are two intertwined things here:
1. a plugin, to be used in the service worker, that pulls content from IPFS using Gun for addressing
2. a tool to *push* content to Gun and IPFS, which the way it's currently implemented has to happen in the browser window context because it's using window.performance.getEntriesByType("resource")

It was just easier for me to implement it like that. No strong feelings about it, though!

@tomasino plus there are things that can be moved out to a general Samizdat library to be available in both contexts perhaps (listLocalResources)

So yeah, it's a mess. And it would benefit greatly from me being able to rubber duck it all with someone. So as soon as I'm back in 101, first coffee's on me!

@tomasino so:

- service-worker.js is entirely service worker
- samizdat.js is entirely browser window (and some stuff from index.html and from gun-ipfs.js should probably be moved there)
- gun-ipfs.js is... complicated, and needs cleaning up, but feels like it should remain a separate "plugin" file, so that adding new plugins is not too hard.

@tomasino thanks! I hope it's at least a tiny bit more readable now.

There's a bug where fetch plugin is called twice, but I know what's going on and I think I know how to fix it.

I'll try to work on feature branches from now on, so as not to screw you over in case you want to work on something. ;)

My next step might be the Samizdat UI.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!