is that of the user the best paradigm to understand online activity at large?

Show thread

what other paradigms of online activity are there? do human agents behave more as admins or moderators than users?

Show thread

to be clear: the admin is technically another type of user, but you get what i mean

Show thread

wikipedia: "Users of computer systems and software products generally lack the technical expertise required to fully understand how they work."

Show thread

Let's put it like this, using a thought experiment. The offline world suddenly disappears: no cities, no buildings, no bodies, no objects. Human agents are only able to interact through and within current digital interfaces. How human activity would differ? How our understanding of current online activities would differ?

Show thread

is world-building, understood as building a durable interface with the totality of the real, still possible online?

Show thread

again, following Arendt, one could say that a website is a work/object, while a platform is a machine

Show thread

While acting for her means breaking the "fateful automation of sheer happening". Sounds familiar?

Show thread

Reminded now that in his reflections on the "automatic society" Stiegler describes a shift from the everyday life to the administered life. Might be the 'Vita Administrativa' (both administering and being administering) the crucial sphere of activity missing in Arendt's model of human practical capacities?

Show thread

if I were to point out a fundamental paradigm shift of user behavior in terms of interaction with an interface, due to the advent of the corporate web, I'd say that the user was reconfigured as a scroller, and therefore as passive consumer because the interaction is purely mechanical and only accidentally performed manually.

Show thread

the paradox seems to be that web 2.0 which was supposed to bring MORE interactivity, eventually reduced it

Show thread

ok, I put some of these notes quickly together on the blog. Main idea: proletarisation of user interaction. Comments welcome! networkcultures.org/entrepreca

Show thread

apropos, Simondon argues that the machine replaces the tool-equipped individual (the worker)

Show thread

i guess the fundamental question is: can we really consider the web a metamedium?

Show thread

forgot about Striphas notion of "controlled consumption", which is quite related to the user condition I'd say (source is my thesis)

Show thread

and now I'm in the rabbit hole of understanding the evolution of AJAX and XMLHttpRequest. Is it true that the "killer app" for the technology was Gmail?

Show thread

ok, so here's my tentative chronology of XMLHttpRequest/ AJAX:

2000: Microsoft comes up with XMLHttpRequest (the cornerstone of AJAX) and implements it in Outlook Mail: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMLHttpR

2002: Oddpost.com uses JavaScript to mimic a desktop mail application, using AJAX methodologies: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oddpost

2004: Google borrows several ideas from Oddpost to create Gmail: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oddpost

Show thread

Apparently at the time there was some discomfort with the idea of turning webpages into apps. Where can I find more about this?

Show thread
Follow

@entreprecariat There was some discussion about "browser can not/should not become the universal user interface for everything, it wasn't meant for that". Also do not forget

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 0

@saper Right, Flash! I haven't thought about that…

@entreprecariat But the discussion was well before Flash. Macromedia opened casual user's eyes to what could possibly be done with vector stuff. 1996 is too early, the year I got my Internet Explorer 1.0 T-Shirt; but Berners-Lee compared the development of the Web to the radio and TV and said "you haven't seen anything yet"

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!