@squid lmao. it's clearly perjury see how far you can take that

@squid translation of infringement description from capitalist to english: "dear fellow brand, this consumer is making art we don't agree with, please stop them."

@squid
I'm glad twitter is finally closed. You did *win* twitter, so, what more is there?

@squid btw if you contest that someone at the EFF would probably love to represent you

@squid imaging the flustered social media employee personally offended writing that up

@squid Didn't you know that offending people is covered under copyright law now? Yeah it was the hallmark case of Landon vs Butthurt Bertha in Apruary of 201🟃.

(No you can't have any of what I'm smoking.)

@squid
How can it violate their copyright if THEY GAVE PERMISSION? :blobfrowningbig:

@squid They're covering up the truth of how Cheney and Socks did it

@squid I am not a fan of 9/11 jokes. That said, this is clearly satire and should be protected under fair use. I don't think Cheez-Its has a valid claim here. Disappointing to see Twitter complied with such a ridiculous DMCA notice.

@squid "a photoshopped image is showing our Cheez-It cracker hitting the Twin Towers" is one of the most amazing sentences i've ever read

@healyn @squid it's no use, this is the people's cheez-it now! It's out of your hands!

@squid what I'm getting from this is that Cheez-It definitely did 9/11 and is trying to cover it up

@squid my coworkers looked a bit confused when i just started laughing like a maniac

@squid do you have the original cheezit hitting the twin towers image? Can you post it here?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!