like given *we* don’t use (mathematically-correct) YYYYMMDD I’m willing to cut you some slack on MMDDYYYY but this is where I draw the line.
@ruth I mean I do agree on principle but date order is slightly easier to determine from context than a time zone abbreviation
@ticky it's true, I've just decided that if one leans into this, my misery index can be so greatly reduced, y'know?
@ruth for sure. sensible formatting for all things!
@rateldajer @ruth well, not by using file names, I guess :P
@ticky Been in US for almost 3 decades now, still not happy with MMDDYYYY. In fact traditionally in astrophysics we do use YYYYMMDD although younger generation seems to do this less alas.
@planet4589 yeah I guess DDMMYYYY is winning. It’s practical I guess but given it’s mathematically backwards I wish it weren’t winning…
@ticky Don't worry, its use will go down with the coming collapse of the USA.
@planet4589 “former soviet state” : USSR :: ??? : USA
@planet4589 (p.s. IDK the USA has a lot of international English-speaking cultural influence which I suspect won’t just vanish overnight if the union did?)
@ticky Well, yes. DDMMYYYY will survive (or even thrive under the 3rd British Empire) but hopefully the illogical MMDDYYYY will die.
@ticky “former soviet state” : USSR :: "post-Trumpian survivor camps" : USA ?
@planet4589 maybe a little too specific
@ticky I buy into all of this except that I really must insist we enforce YYYYMMDD for all dates not written as textual (we can disagree on 7 April, 2017 and April 7, 2017, but we should always use 2017-04-07). Then we can all play better. /metadata librarian moment