ugh i really hope crossposters don't slowly choke mastodon like they did to diaspora*
if you're just crossposting everything you tweet on birdsite then what even is the point of making a mastodon account? that's glorified spam at worst, and a recipe for abandonment.
@DarkestKale i don't wanna give up on them entirely but they're not really doing themselves or the wider network any favors. hard to imagine anyone actually caring to subscribe to auto-posts that just aggregate a feed already present elsewhere... except maybe, like, a website or RSS feed or something? I dunno.
@trwnh I dunno. I was on DIaspora and used the post to tumblr feature it had, for some of my posts, and it felt just the same. Had many interactions on D*.
To me, it all started to go down the hill after Ilya died, and then some drama that I don't even want to undig. It took me 6 years to almost-forget. :x
Having this said: yay, a fellow Diasporian! :D
Also: in general, I agree with you on this.
@eloisa Well, Diaspora* and Tumblr are different. Diaspora* has more overlap with Facebook, in that it's essentially a profile page (and not strictly a microblog).
The people I knew who made the jump from '09-'10 era Facebook did one of two things: 1) go back to Facebook, or 2) abandon Facebook-like platforms entirely for microblogs (like Twitter or Tumblr).
And then Google+ came out and totally aped any chance at success Diaspora* had, as "essentially the same thing but backed by Google".
@trwnh oh, yeah. I remember the "good ole times" when G+ launched and I had to explain ppl that NO, D* does NOT look like G+, it's the other way around! D: Gah. Still to this day I have to say this to some people who disappoint me because come on, if you're into Open Source, Social Media platforms et al, this was basic knowledge! D:
@eloisa speaking of which... I wish those caught on somehow. Maybe they were TOO prominent in the UX and therefore confusing. But, well, it's nice to control who can see what. Unfortunately, it only works with two-way connections -- if someone is just "following" you, then you need a DIFFERENT categorization system for the other direction.
@trwnh Ah! I had a flashback to "the aspect's esprit" rip-off when I heard about Vero and how they make everyone put people in aspects (they call it something else) before being able to accept a request. They also have a follow, for when you're not mutuals/friends, but again, nothing new in the social media verse - and so, the output to the public sphere stays the same.
@trwnh I have it since Nov 17, but only really started using it now.
I haven't been very well health-wise, especially between April 2016 and Nov, 17. And this affected my decisions regarding use of social media, etc.
It still does, but now 'm slowly but surely coming back to my old self (it's a lie, we never really come back, but you get the picture, I hope), and thus, starting to enjoy things again, like Mastodon, etc. :)
@tastymochafox i feel ya. personally if i log into twitter i usually post totally different things there, but if i was crossposting i'd do it mastodon -> twitter because i care less about twitter -- i've already given up on it.
for a new person who signs up to mastodon and has 0 friends, setting up a crossposter means they don't interact with anyone, so no one follows them, so they don't show up in feeds, so they think it's a ghost town and quit.
@xj that fixes it for you or me, but not for the new person who signs up to check out this new mastodon thing and tries to reply to an account that was set up by some schmuck who simply set up a crossposter and then never logged into mastodon again
anyway, there's been enough genuine growth since i posted this that i'm less worried about mastodon being choked out
@Wolf480pl that's fine, most people will recognize your account is a feed and not really an active person
with crossposting stuff from twitter, the result *looks* like it's a person but it's actually not; it's often some person that made a mastodon account to crosspost, and then probably never logged in again. they're not genuinely giving mastodon / the fediverse a "chance", they're setting themselves up for abandonment. here's another toot from back in november about it https://mastodon.social/@trwnh/99069771440360397
@trwnh I don’t know. I’m still a beginner on mastodon, maybe halfway in the migration from twitter. I post original content first on mastodon, but can’t give up twitter for news/friends. In the long term, I don’t have the time and energy to be active on two networks.
On the software side, Amaroq is not as good as Tweetbot, but as Twitter is working hard to cripple 3rd party apps, this won’t matter.
>i post original content first on mastodon
so you're still at least trying to use mastodon and giving it a fair chance, then; you're fine!
>in the long term, i don't have the time and energy to be active on two networks
and most people don't either! that's why they end up gravitating to whichever network is their "primary". to say nothing of people who *only* sign up for masto to link a crossposter, and then never sign in again...
@grabe and there won't be, if no one commits to making meaningful posts
although this has definitely gotten better since i first made the OP in november. there are enough people to follow here to generate a feed of interesting stuff now, and either i've muted enough of the worst offenders or they've stopped signing up as much.
@trwnh the point is that this is where we should be, but some people can't or simply don't know they should be leaving birdsite.
Probably 99.9% of twitter users have never even heard of the fediverse. It won't be for a long time until we can ignore birdsite and post entirely here.
@jeffcliff and you'll probably never interact with 99.9% of twitter users
as for ignoring birdsite... depends on what you're trying to get out of it. I've been disengaging slowly throughout 2017 and gave up on it almost entirely for 2018. twitter is actively biasing its service away from conversations and social graphs, and in favor of viral and curated content. I can't even be sure my tweets are showing up in people's feeds anymore.
@jeffcliff @textfiles Well, that could happen given anyone "large enough" deleted their Twitter entirely and went all-in on the open social web. Entire niches of the community could be carved out around something as simple as a podcast. But a lot of people are slaves to the network effects; perhaps their livelihoods depend on it, they think. And they're probably right to some degree, depending on how much presence or staying power they have outside of Twitter ("IRL").