Follow

🎤 I am planning to make some videos testing various audio interfaces with Linux, focusing on "bedroom producers". 🎵

However - I need YOU to answer a few questions before I can begin my work.

Your input will help me choose devices to buy. Please take some time to research the options - there's a lot that you may have not heard about, that could present great value.

pad.gieszer.link/form/#/2/form

PS: Feel free to boost this toot :)

@unfa

I am excited that it might be possible to use a focusright with linux, but i am completely confused by the instructions for the survey.

Am I supposed to put a green check under the items I DON'T want to ever purchase?

(Honestly, I've only ever considered class-compliant devices because linux, so I don't know much about the fancier ones. The only thing I'd rule out is behringer for their generally poor behaviour including online antisemitism.)

@celesteh Thanks for your input! I've corrected the description to hopefully make it clear. Can you please check again and let me know if it's better now?

@celesteh Thanks! I'm glad you've let me know so quick so I could fix it before more people got confused!

@unfa I also have some feedback about the survey itself.

(this may sound obvious but I'd make it clearer in your question) I'd only consider to buy an interface if you made a video about it...*and the review outcome was very positive*.

I'm not familiar with any of those interfaces except the one I know. I don't see the point for me to learn more about them / familiarize with them when the aim is you reviewing them. The moment I've evaluated them, I don't need a review.

Checking each interface also looked time-consuming so I didn't bother to. Providing direct links near the interfaces may push more people to actually check them?

The cross mark / green checks were a bit confusing too.

I've selected the Focusrite 2i2 3rd generation,

@unfa (hey sorry: I hope my feedback doesn't sound rude, it wasn't meant to...your work is greatly appreciated)

@pixelflowers Yeah, I expect that one to be the most popular option, even stats on Thomann.de show it's by far the most popular I/F in that class. But I want to review more than just this one device, and also take a look at some lesser-known but maybe still excellent devices.

@unfa as @pixelflowers said, It would help if you'd add links to the devices in the list so we could check them out easily. I don't know any of them by name.

@cos @pixelflowers I see. It should've probably collected the links when I was making the form. I thought it'd be problematic. I've now added a list of links so it's easier to research the devices. Thanks for the feedback!

@unfa I don't know the details of any of those interfaces. If I were in the market, I'd look for one with two mic preamps, digital input, direct monitoring, and preferably midi ports. Or if I got the band back together, the absolute cheapest way to get 16 or so inputs.

@unfa I filled out the survey; looking forward to that comparison.
Would you consider adding the Zoom H5 to the review?
It is of course a mobile recorder first and an audio interface second, but for someone just starting out it is an interesting "One device that can do it all" option. (This is why I chose it 😆 )

@Mightyflea That's an interesting idea. I did not think about it, as it's a bit outside the target price range though...

@unfa Yes it is more pricey; but if you add the price of a microphone to a USB interface, it is not that far off.
Myself, I wanted the mobile recording anyway, so the USB capability meant I didn't have to shell out for a proper USB interface right away.

@unfa (I find the handling as an audio interface awkward, so if I wind up recording at home more often I might get a dedicated interface anyway.)

@Mightyflea I think it might be actually a very nice option for a "studio in a pocket" solution. The first audio recorder / interface I ever got was Zoom H2. It was money well spent and gave me both home recording and field recording options.
However the portable ones are a different category entirely. I am afraid if we're considering it, then we should consider much more. And at that point it becomes apparent this should be a separate project.

Focusrite Saffire Series (24/40/56) - RME Fireface

I looked into some of these a year ago. I almost bought one, but then choosing a matching microphone completely broke my budget and also my capacity to look even further down the rabbit hole. I would like to suggest giving hints for microphones alongside. Maybe a budget option, a decent one and a "nice" one. Of course this could also be in the form of a "that blog/test/video over there covers it all!"

@unfa I got the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 gen3 working really easily.

Then I needed more inputs, so I got the M-Audio Air 192|14, which sorta works. I can't get it to work with Reaper in PulseAudio, but it does work in ALSA, but there's some clipping. It might work better with JACK, but I don't know how to set that up.

@unfa the Behringer ones are really good (because of the Xmos chip) (And as someone else pointed out - one has to live with the company's harassment strategies). Another honourable mention is the Fireface UCX II - probably the highest quality interface for Linux (and a price tag that goes with it).

@madskjeldgaard I have bought some Behringer hardware before I've learned about their very ethically questionable "business" decisions. I would prefer to not promote their stuff for that reason, unfortunately their gear is the cheapest you can get.

@unfa yeah that's understandable. They really are terrible

@unfa And one thing that is often overlooked when testing interfaces on linux: Sample rates. Some interfaces have trouble changing to 96k or 192k even though they advertise it because their CC drivers are half assed

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!