I wouldn't call the content warnings on Mastodon a bad decision, but the way they are used is such a bad user experience. Timeline interfaces work best with scrolling, not clicking.
Content warnings are not headlines. Content warnings are not summaries.
Use CWs if you write about a delicate topic or movie spoilers.
Don't make your followers click on every of your petty toots to be able to read them.
By now I think that using CWs the way they were intended and having an option in your client to display them by default are two separate things.
Example: @tootapp has this option, but the way CWs are labelled makes them look like actual sponsored toots.
@zichy Agreed. Unless the CW'd toot has a good explaining summary, I don't click on them, I just scroll right by...
@zichy But also, content warnings are titles and subject lines. You get to choose whether to engage or whether to scroll. And if you scroll by, that's fine!
@trwnh The problem is that there aren't any interfaces or clients which allow to keep CWs open by default.
@zichy Counterpoint: Content warnings as headlines or summaries are an excellent way to avoid big walls of text and make it easier for me to skim through a busy timeline.
@ghost_bird I think that one shouldn't be forced to click on a toot to read it (if there isn't a contentual reason). It's counterintuitive to the idea of scrolling through timelines.
@zichy I see where you're coming from, but I think the higher character limit (as compared to twitter) changes the experience of scrolling.
And also, Mastodon's a bit slower-paced and less immediate than Twitter. I don't find myself scanning the timeline for breaking news in the way I did over there.
@attero Thanks, I found out that Tootdon has the same feature just now.
@zichy What does "actual sponsored toots" mean considering there is no such thing?
@rixx Oh yeah, it may sound misleading. I meant that it looks like there were sponsored toots.
@zichy Wir brauchen einfach richtige Werbung, um das unterscheiden zu können!
@saschafiedler I'm not sure if limiting CWs is a good idea (or possible anyway).
@zichy Yes. For many toots, I'd think the appropriate label would have been “Subject”, not CW.
Server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!