sounds interesting<p><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Democrats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Democrats</span></a> could help themselves a lot (and decimate that offensive <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/gop" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>gop</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/EveryMan" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>EveryMan</span></a> grift) if they could mend this toxic Us vs Them rift. Only one kind of equity, worker, “<a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/RealAmerica" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RealAmerica</span></a>” etc…</p><p>Especially as the solution is mostly just, “Why Not Both”? </p><p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/01/magazine/marie-gluesenkamp-perez.html" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nytimes.com/2024/07/01/magazin</span><span class="invisible">e/marie-gluesenkamp-perez.html</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/HappyFourth" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>HappyFourth</span></a> 🇺🇸 <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/BlueCollar" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BlueCollar</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/WhiteCollar" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>WhiteCollar</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Unions4All" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Unions4All</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/WorkersUnite" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>WorkersUnite</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/VoteForDemocrats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>VoteForDemocrats</span></a></p>