Scientific Communism: grounded in historical materialism and offers a rigorous analysis of class struggles, production forces, and social relations
Utopian Communism (a.k.a., Libertarian Communism, a.k.a., Anarcho-Communism): the exact opposite in every way. It lacks a scientific basis, relies on idealism instead of material conditions, and, as a result, is wholly disconnected from reality.
@Radical_EgoCom @Fosco well.. "scientific socialists" never put workers in charge of production, society etc.
Instead they built giant beureaucratic regimes and most of them collapsed.
Anarchists actually built societys on the basis of communism and failed, because larger militaries destroyed them
History doesn't judge well about the accomplishments of Leninists and Maoists
@LucaStern @Radical_EgoCom@mastodon.social
Hey Radical, you little tankie, watch this and shut up!
Anark: What is the State/ The State is Counter-Revolutionary (Part 1) :
https://youtu.be/uTwxpTyGUOI?si=t6kkBAIYBSIaQIXw
You weren't blocked. Your @ to my message didn't work for some reason. I'm just now seeing your comment. Look at the image below. My @ isn't glowing blue, which means I wasn't notified when you sent your message. Also, I've already seen that crappy video by Anark, and I don't agree with it.
@Radical_EgoCom @Fosco well if you aren't interested in debating, why don't you follow Foscos andvice?
I am interested in debating. I never said I wasn't. If you or Fosco wants to debate, then I'm ready.
@Radical_EgoCom @LucaStern @Fosco just claiming being scientific doesn’t actually make you scientific. It’s just a desperate attempt of rhetorically discrediting anti-authoritarian workers struggle. Marx used those tactics and was somewhat successful in The Hague International conference. Later most sections revoked the decisions from The Hague (where Bakunin wasn’t present) which lead to the end of the international.
@Radical_EgoCom @LucaStern @Fosco in my practical experience, MLs fail at speaking accessible language and thoughts with union members.