I don't want to maintain my emacs-based blog engine anymore. Any opinions on static site generators?

@federicomena Few years ago, I started to convert my #Wordpress blog to #Nikola. It was quite fun and #RST is really cool as there is a single implementation. But it seems that #Mardown won the war. So, when I recently have to select a new static generator again, I give #Hugo a try. I find it really interesting as it is really agnostic about the site it generates, while #Pelican and #Nikola are tainted by #blog concepts.


@guyou Oh, that's interesting. I am having some trouble with Pelican, as I *think* it only supports a single blog in a site, and I need more than one.

@federicomena So take a look at #Hugo. It implicitly come with a *section* topic offering the ability to fine tune the rendering of each section.
The counter part is you need to go deeper in the templating engine.
But I imagine that an #emacs user cannot be afraid by that sort of challenge. 😉

@federicomena As an example, the following site is made with #Hugo: fcpe.montrabe.free.fr/
One section contains static pages, an other is rendered as a calendar. As an extension, I would be able to add an other section as a collection of posts, etc.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Follow friends and discover new ones. Publish anything you want: links, pictures, text, video. This server is run by the main developers of the Mastodon project. Everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!