Does mainstream Permaculture philosophy include computers?

What's the maximum sustainable global population and civilisation following Permaculture principles.

Is it more or less than the minimum global population and civilisation that can support a chip foundry?

@jbond Seems like that's entirely dependent on technology level. Victorian technology couldn't support a chip founders no matter the resources it used. Vinge's The Peace War has chip foundries and supercomputers using very little energy, because they had to.

@seanl It's a stepping off point for discussion.

I don't think chip foundries and hence automation should be put at the pinnacle of the pyramid of human achievement. But there's still a huge base set of activity required to support all the activities that eventually result in the chip foundry.

Yes, Permaculture is prone to poverty tourism. But "Sustainable" is still necessary. In the long run (>100 years, <1m years), it's sustainability or nothing.

@jbond If we're still bound to this planet for even the next 200 years I think we're screwed. Not because I think it will become unlivable in that time but because if we can't do it by then there's something seriously wrong with humanity.

Follow

@seanl Space is big. The gravity well is deep. Space is extremely hostile to meat sacks. (for three). So I wonder where you think humans will go and in what numbers within the next 200 years.

Meanwhile, there's a few billion who won't be going anywhere.

@jbond It may end up being our mechanized descendants who end up spreading to the stars. But living in space ans getting around the solar system seem pretty solvable.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

Follow friends and discover new ones. Publish anything you want: links, pictures, text, video. This server is run by the main developers of the Mastodon project. Everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!