@Downes much of it may be well over my head (namely sessions 1-7), but I'll be there. I'll be quite happy with the last two :)

@lauraritchie My objective is to make it so that these topics are not over anyone's head. It's a bit difficult; each week is the very tip of an abyss; I find myself drowning in it almost every day (today, for example, exploring the JAM Stack and failing to make the Google API work the way I want it to. But I'm hopeful; and people will be learning with me.

@Downes say that before the start - as you'll know, once an expert, that reputation precedes you whether that's desired or not- and I know you learn in the open, but I think people might not *expect* that.

Also there are many practitioners who would benefit from the course but will be put off by the tech at the front end of the course. -if you say, for example, about the one click Reclaim Hosting install, you'll have instant attendees who might otherwise have, at best, lurked.


@lauraritchie @Downes "put off by the tech at the front": That's indeed a danger. But a real cMOOC will not require the previous stuff for the subsequent stuff? The stuff is just the McGuffin?

Β· Web Β· 2 Β· 0 Β· 0

@x28de @lauraritchie I'm trying to set this up so that each week is a self-contained topic. This topic can then be approached from different directions, at different levels. The content is a McGuffin - yes - but the other aspect of a connectivist course, the one where I provide a series of reflections - is also present.

@Downes I think a 'how to participate' post may both explain and entice a lot of people.

You started to do this (adding the what you get out of it/what's different) at the bottom of your g-doc page, but to get that far, people need to read all the rest first :)


@x28de @lauraritchie @Downes I also think the tech might be a danger, depending on who you want your audience to be and why. I am always interested in your work and ideas Stephen, but I would need a 'Dummies Guide' to gRSShopper and would really need to be convinced that it would benefit me, e.g. although I tried out FedWiki I found the tech side frustrating and by the end I couldn't see what was to be gained from the technology. But I know I am not an early adopter :-)

@jennymac @x28de @lauraritchie @GeoffreyGevalt

OK, I've written a short introduction capturing the comments all of you have made. Before I post it generally, could you have a look and tell me what I'm missing?


@Downes @jennymac @x28de @lauraritchie Stephen, thanks so much. That helps enormously to get my tired little brain around what you are planning. Daunting, but awesome. I look forward to participating and learning from you and others. cheers.

@Downes @x28de @lauraritchie @GeoffreyGevalt Thanks - that works really well for me and is reassuring, although I don't have a clue what JAM Stack or Google API are, so I wonder if reference to them should be so near the beginning. That said, I think you have to assume that those interested in participating will have some background in all this.
I noticed a typo in the para beginning -Another way of looking at community - but it reads really well.

@Downes @x28de @lauraritchie @GeoffreyGevalt Will you have an 'About me' page - which will explain your background and why you think it important to offer this?

@jennymac @Downes next up we'll be requesting your cat to join in with the hangouts :)

I'm only half joking - part of the thing that comes with being an expert is also the possibility of (incorrect) perception of being so far removed from everyday experience of the other.

@x28de @GeoffreyGevalt

@lauraritchie @jennymac @x28de @GeoffreyGevalt Oh I fully expect my cat Alex to make an appearance in the videos. I'll leave it up to him tho - you can't force a cat to do anything. (We also have two other cats but there is no chance that they would ever jump up while I'm doing a video).

@Downes Seriously though, I will be there and will happily blog away bumbling through and asking very public questions about tech when stumped. :) @jennymac @x28de @GeoffreyGevalt

@lauraritchie @jennymac @x28de @GeoffreyGevalt Awesome - it's so helpful when someone does that, because people think they're the only ones who don't know, and are afraid to ask, when in fact most people don't know.

@Downes fantastic!

Only one (tiny) suggestion - edit it to be simply 'about me' instead of that archaic and loaded term 'instructor' - especially as you have elegantly and convincingly demonstrated above that you will be 'in it' with us.

@jennymac @x28de @GeoffreyGevalt

@Downes initial reaction though, is YES! and when I got to the how we learn bit, that is *exactly* the talk I gave my students today- who all frustratingly refuse to make blogs

It sounds like the 'course' is really an interactive OER-handbook. It's quite like (although completely different scope) my music class- that isn't a class at all, but a growing resource that people in my class follow as they work toward an outcome.

I never got fancy and it's all on the MUS654 tab on lauraritchie.com

@lauraritchie Yes, I want it to be a growing resource.

But I also want it to be an event, so people feel they're participating, not just consuming.

@Downes yes - the community is what makes these good. Solo is ok, but it's like playing music in a practice room only - you just miss so much of everything from process, to creation and communication, to engaging with those on the receiving end.

If it can be a recurring and growing event, even better. :)

@Downes @x28de @lauraritchie @GeoffreyGevalt Great. I think its important to introduce yourself, even if most people will already know of you. There's a typo in the first sentence of para 5 - and I'm not sure about the first sentence in the last para, which doesn't seem to read quite right.

@jennymac @x28de @lauraritchie @GeoffreyGevalt Took me a moment to figure out what was wrong, then realized I had written 'ask' instead of 'as'. :p Fixed.

@Downes I have just tweeted your half-an-hour post about E-learning 3.0 and realised that it doesn't have a date for the course in it. Is this intentional?

@Downes @jennymac I've been watching and waiting as well. I think it's because in your post it says the website will launch in the end of Sept. -so I was wondering if we are supposed to do pre-work or anything.

18th is WAY better :)
Treading water in work over here...

@Downes @x28de @lauraritchie @GeoffreyGevalt I wonder about the word 'Instructor'. Do you view yourself as 'the instructor'? I remember your post - the role of the educator :-) I'm just thinking that if you are running this on your own, then you wouldn't want everyone turning to you with every question?

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!