You better don't retweet this since I made a really dumb mistake. It's ~2.7 logs per transaction NOT 0.33
Oh noes - I made a very stupid calculation error. It's of course 2.7 logs per transaction.
@firstname.lastname@example.org Pretty sure this comes out to ~ 1/3 transaction per log, not log per transaction.
177 transactions / 1 cord * 1 cord / 480 log = 177 transactions / 480 log => 480 log / 177 transations ~ 2.7 log per transaction
Inspecting the overnight progress.
We’re excited about the potential impact #AlphaFold may have on the future of biological research and scientific discovery. Thank you to the CASP organisers & the whole community - we look forward to the many years of hard work and discovery ahead: https://bit.ly/3qdko1Q
We are losing him, Jim.
Last Christmas, I gave you my art
But the very next day you gave it away.
This year, to save me from tears
I'll mint it for someone special.
The latent wormholes in these examples are almost acceptable.
It's almost as if I have never been away.
A little more augmentation, a little less abstraction.
For a moment I had my hopes up, but at about 3 am the whole model collapsed.
Trying to continue the training with a different γ value. So far it is still trapped in slug-face territory. I fear the data is just too dissimilar and unaligned to ever reach a "normal" look.
With a little bit of good will I can recognize a giant killer robot and Armageddon by meteor storm and flying monster slugs here. Still no humans in sight.
Server run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!