For you e-ink phone minimalists, this looks cool - https://mudita.com/products/pure/
@DNSresolver
bortzmeyer.org NS
@DNSresolver
sub.jpmens.org. A
@DNSresolver
sub.jpmens.org. NS
@DNSresolver
corp.ds.fedex.com NS
;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode.
https://gist.github.com/jpmens/d50ee39432baaeb3bcd78057115124b8
Oh neat, RFC 1035 as PDF & print for only $71.40, you save 30%!
ICYMI: If you do not want a domain to receive any mail, there is a way to be at last somewhat civil about it. There's a different DNS trick for that.
RFC7505 and a few notes https://bsdly.blogspot.com/2021/02/rfc7505-means-yes-your-domain-can.html
resolvd(8) - daemon to handle nameserver configuration
https://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article;sid=20210225084959 #openbsd
APNIC puts DNSSEC signers to the test: Knot-2.9 vs BIND-9.16 https://blog.apnic.net/2021/02/25/putting-dnssec-signers-to-the-test-knot-vs-bind/
Ah tiens, la dernière version d'Unbound (1.13.1) permet d'ajouter un NSID (RFC 5001) à son résolveur.
Avec le paramètre "nsid" soit suivi d'une chaîne hexadécimale (le format de NSID), soit en préfixant "ascii_" le nom voulu
Spoiler : ça marche.
Par contre, j'étais persuadé que c'était implémenté depuis longtemps 🤔
ISC history timeline. (DNS and DHCP)
That grumpy BSD guy: RFC7505 Means Yes, Your Domain Can Refuse to Handle Mail. Please Leave Us a TXT If You Do. https://bsdly.blogspot.com/2021/02/rfc7505-means-yes-your-domain-can.html (with thanks to @thorsheim for reminding me of that actually useful RFC)
A love letter to ISC BIND
XSLT now supports JSON. I thought you should know. https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-30/#json
Small-scale fiddler, enjoys doing & teaching. Wrote a thick book on FLOSS DNS servers. Dreamed up @OwnTracks over MQTT. Ansible with NOCOWS=1. Loves plain text. I (re-)toot in several languages. https://jpmens.net